Suppr超能文献

Medpore与颏成形术骨增量术的比较

Medpore versus osseous augmentation in genioplasty procedure: A comparison.

作者信息

Mohammad Shadab, Dwivedi Chandra Dhar, Singh R K, Singh Vibha, Pal U S

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, C.S.M Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.69147.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genioplasty deals with small area of craniofacial complex, namely, chin. Alloplastic chin implants and sliding genioplasty represent the two currently accepted methods of chin augmentation. Chin augmentation with medpore has become popular in the recent years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study comprised 16 patients having retruded chin, out of whom 8 patients underwent sliding genioplasty while the other 8 underwent chin augmentation using medpore. The versatility and benefits of the two techniques are discussed.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

All the patients achieved satisfactory results with no complication. Both the techniques can be used for mild to moderate retrogenia, while in the case of severe retrogenia, sliding genioplasty is recommended. Medpore is especially used for revision of chin shape. Medpore can give the same satisfactory result as osseous genioplasty in cases of mild to moderate horizontal chin deficiency. All the patients from both the groups showed significant improvement in facial profile and high degree of satisfaction resulting in improved self-esteem.

摘要

背景

颏成形术针对颅面复合体的小区域,即下巴。异体下巴植入物和滑动颏成形术是目前两种被认可的下巴增大方法。近年来,使用多孔聚乙烯进行下巴增大已变得流行。

材料与方法

该研究包括16例下巴后缩患者,其中8例接受滑动颏成形术,另外8例使用多孔聚乙烯进行下巴增大。讨论了这两种技术的多功能性和益处。

结果与结论

所有患者均取得满意效果,无并发症。两种技术均可用于轻度至中度小颏畸形,而对于严重小颏畸形,建议采用滑动颏成形术。多孔聚乙烯特别用于下巴形状的修复。在轻度至中度水平下巴不足的情况下,多孔聚乙烯可给出与骨性颏成形术相同的满意效果。两组所有患者的面部轮廓均有显著改善,满意度高,自尊心增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5863/3304182/09028202fa92/NJMS-1-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验