Gong D H, Weiskopf R B, Neumann M A, Laster M J, Eger E I
Department of Anesthesia, University of California-San Francisco 94143-0648, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):198-201. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00038.
The lower solubility of desflurane allows a more rapid emergence from anesthesia than after anesthesia with the more soluble but less expensive anesthetic, isoflurane. Some practitioners use isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia, crossing over to desflurane later in maintenance in an attempt to combine the cost-effectiveness of isoflurane with the rapid emergence from desflurane. We hypothesized that this maneuver would not accomplish its goals. Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats received 1.2 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of desflurane for the final 15, 30, or 60 min of a 2-h, 1.2-MAC isoflurane anesthetic in a nonrebreathing anesthesia system. We measured the time from cessation of anesthetic administration to the time each rat righted himself twice. Immediately after righting for the second time, we tested each rat's ability to remain atop a rotating rod (Rota-Rod) for 60 s continuously. Early (righting reflex) and late (Rota-Rod) recovery occurred more rapidly (P < 0.001) after 120 min of anesthesia with desflurane alone than after 120 min of anesthesia with isoflurane alone. A cross-over period of 30 min or longer produced a righting reflex time that did not differ from that found with desflurane alone, but a 15-min cross-over did not. Progressively longer cross-over periods led to proportionally better Rota-Rod performance, but no cross-over duration produced the rapidity of recovery seen with desflurane alone. We concluded that in a nonrebreathing system, switching to desflurane during the last 30 min of anesthesia substantially improved early recovery but produced a much smaller improvement in later recovery.
The newer inhaled anesthetics offer the advantage of lower solubility, and thus more rapid emergence from anesthesia, than do the older inhaled anesthetics. However, they can be more expensive to use. This study demonstrates that substituting the newer anesthetic, desflurane, toward the end of anesthesia for an older anesthetic of greater solubility, isoflurane, does not produce recovery comparable to that of desflurane alone. Furthermore, this technique can be more costly than using desflurane throughout anesthesia.
地氟烷的溶解度较低,与溶解度较高但价格较低的麻醉药异氟烷相比,使用地氟烷麻醉后能更快从麻醉状态苏醒。一些从业者在麻醉维持阶段先使用异氟烷,后期改用 地氟烷,试图将异氟烷的成本效益与地氟烷的快速苏醒相结合。我们推测这种做法无法实现其目标。在非再呼吸麻醉系统中,24 只雄性斯普拉格 - 道利大鼠在 2 小时、1.2 最低肺泡麻醉浓度(MAC)的异氟烷麻醉的最后 15、30 或 60 分钟接受 1.2 MAC 的地氟烷。我们测量了从停止给药到每只大鼠自行翻身两次的时间。在第二次翻身之后,我们立即测试每只大鼠在旋转杆(Rota - Rod)上连续停留 60 秒的能力。与单独使用异氟烷麻醉 120 分钟相比,单独使用地氟烷麻醉 120 分钟后,早期(翻身反射)和晚期(旋转杆测试)恢复更快(P < 0.001)。30 分钟或更长时间的交叉期产生的翻身反射时间与单独使用地氟烷时没有差异,但 15 分钟的交叉期则不然。交叉期越长,旋转杆测试表现越好,但没有交叉期能产生单独使用地氟烷时那样快速的恢复。我们得出结论,在非再呼吸系统中,在麻醉最后 30 分钟切换到地氟烷可显著改善早期恢复,但对后期恢复的改善要小得多。
与旧的吸入麻醉药相比,新型吸入麻醉药具有溶解度较低的优势,因此能更快从麻醉中苏醒。然而,它们的使用成本可能更高。这项研究表明,在麻醉后期用新型麻醉药地氟烷替代溶解度更高的旧麻醉药异氟烷,并不能产生与单独使用地氟烷相当的恢复效果。此外,这种技术可能比在整个麻醉过程中都使用地氟烷成本更高。