• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

庆大霉素致耳蜗损伤的听性脑干反应(ABR)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)检测

ABR and DPOAE detection of cochlear damage by gentamicin.

作者信息

Shi Y, Martin W H

机构信息

Garfield Auditory Research Laboratory, Temple University Medical School, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

出版信息

J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;8(3):141-55. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.1997.8.3.141.

DOI:10.1515/jbcpp.1997.8.3.141
PMID:9429983
Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) have been applied to the evaluation of peripheral auditory function. To date, no comparison of their relative sensitivities to aminoglycoside toxicity has been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare click evoked ABR testing and 2f1-f2 DPOAEs as detectors of cochlear damage induced by gentamicin treatment in guinea-pigs. ABR thresholds to click stimuli were recorded. DPOAE amplitude input/output functions were recorded using three different primary tone level conditions. In one condition, L1 was changed relative to a fixed L2. In the next condition, L2 was changed relative to a fixed L1. In the third condition, L1 and L2 were both changed while maintaining a consistent L1-L2 difference. Baseline L1-L2 differences were determined by adjusting L2 to produce the maximum DPOAE amplitude in each ear of each subject. Guinea-pigs were treated for a four week period with intramuscular injections of gentamicin. ABRs and DPOAEs were monitored and compared to baseline recordings or untreated control groups. DPOAE testing detected cochlear damage earlier than ABR testing. Changes in DPOAE input/output functions were noted after two weeks of treatment while changes in ABR threshold were not identified until after three weeks of treatment. The sensitivity of the DPOAE testing was related to the stimulus conditions utilized. L1-L2 differences were determined in the control group and for the initial test session by fixing L1 at 75 dB SPL and lowering L2 until the maximum DPOAE amplitude was obtained for each ear. All subsequent testing was begun using the optimal L1-L2 difference for each ear. The stimulus condition in which only L1 was changed and L2 was fixed resulted in the least sensitive DPOAE indicator of cochlear damage. The condition in which both L1 and L2 were changed, but the L1-L2 difference remained constant, resulted in the most sensitive indicator of damage. The onset and degree of cochlear damage secondary to gentamicin treatment was subject dependent. This study demonstrates that 2f1-f2 DPOAE testing is preferable to click evoked ABR testing for early detection of gentamicin toxicity of the cochlea. It also indicates that DPOAE stimulus parameters must be considered when developing test protocols. Specifically, recording the DPOAE amplitude input/output function while maintaining an effective L1-L2 difference is preferable to changing either L1 or L2 individually.

摘要

听性脑干反应(ABR)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)已被应用于外周听觉功能的评估。迄今为止,尚未有关于它们对氨基糖苷类毒性相对敏感性比较的报道。本研究的目的是比较短声诱发ABR测试和2f1-f2 DPOAE作为豚鼠庆大霉素治疗所致耳蜗损伤检测方法的效果。记录短声刺激的ABR阈值。使用三种不同的初始音水平条件记录DPOAE幅度输入/输出函数。在一种条件下,L1相对于固定的L2进行改变。在接下来的条件下,L2相对于固定的L1进行改变。在第三种条件下,L1和L2同时改变,同时保持L1-L2差值恒定。通过调整L2以在每个受试者每只耳朵中产生最大DPOAE幅度来确定基线L1-L2差值。豚鼠通过肌肉注射庆大霉素进行为期四周的治疗。监测ABR和DPOAE,并与基线记录或未治疗的对照组进行比较。DPOAE测试比ABR测试更早地检测到耳蜗损伤。治疗两周后就注意到DPOAE输入/输出函数的变化,而直到治疗三周后才发现ABR阈值的变化。DPOAE测试的敏感性与所采用的刺激条件有关。在对照组和初始测试阶段,通过将L1固定在75 dB SPL并降低L2直到每只耳朵获得最大DPOAE幅度来确定L1-L2差值。所有后续测试均从使用每只耳朵的最佳L1-L2差值开始。仅改变L1而L2固定的刺激条件导致DPOAE对耳蜗损伤的指示最不敏感。L1和L2都改变但L1-L2差值保持恒定的条件导致对损伤最敏感的指示。庆大霉素治疗继发的耳蜗损伤的发生和程度因个体而异。本研究表明,对于早期检测庆大霉素对耳蜗的毒性,2f1-f2 DPOAE测试优于短声诱发ABR测试。它还表明,在制定测试方案时必须考虑DPOAE刺激参数。具体而言,在保持有效的L1-L2差值的同时记录DPOAE幅度输入/输出函数比单独改变L1或L2更可取。

相似文献

1
ABR and DPOAE detection of cochlear damage by gentamicin.庆大霉素致耳蜗损伤的听性脑干反应(ABR)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)检测
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;8(3):141-55. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.1997.8.3.141.
2
Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.正常耳和受损耳中畸变产物耳声发射对原始声级的依赖性。I. 将L2降低至L1以下的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr;97(4):2346-58. doi: 10.1121/1.411959.
3
Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.畸变产物阈值与行为听阈相比的重测信度。
Hear Res. 2021 Jul;406:108232. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108232. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.常见刺激参数对畸变产物耳声发射精细结构的影响。
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):239-49. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182321da4.
5
The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.不同噪声暴露时长对大鼠听觉脑干反应、畸变产物耳声发射和瞬态诱发耳声发射的影响。
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Jan-Feb;6(1):40-9. doi: 10.1159/000046807.
6
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.新生儿听力障碍的识别:瞬态诱发耳声发射、畸变产物耳声发射及听性脑干反应测试性能评估
Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):508-28. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00013.
7
Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.听力正常、暴露于噪声环境的人耳的听觉功能。
Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):172-84. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000107.
8
Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.利用畸变产物耳声发射估计人类的轻度传导性听力损失。
Ear Hear. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):391-398. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000415.
9
[Otoacoustic emissions measurements in children during the chemotherapy because of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia].[急性淋巴细胞白血病化疗期间儿童的耳声发射测量]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(3):415-20.
10
Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.中耳和耳蜗疾病导致不同的畸变产物耳声发射增长行为:对传导性听力损失和耳蜗性听力损失鉴别的意义
Hear Res. 2004 Jul;193(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.03.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional and morphological analysis of different aminoglycoside treatment regimens inducing hearing loss in mice.诱导小鼠听力损失的不同氨基糖苷类治疗方案的功能和形态学分析
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Aug;18(2):1123-1130. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7687. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
Effect of sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome on neonatal hearing screening outcomes following gentamicin exposure.脓毒症和全身炎症反应综合征对庆大霉素暴露后新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;79(11):1915-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Are systemic voriconazole and caspofungin ototoxic? An experimental study with rats.
系统伏立康唑和卡泊芬净是否耳毒性?一项大鼠实验研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Sep;5(3):145-9. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.3.145. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR).瞬态畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAEs)在听性脑干反应(ABR)后即刻的减少。
Hear Res. 2010 Oct 1;269(1-2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
5
Level alterations of the 2f (1)-f (2) distortion product due to hypoxia in the guinea pig depend on the stimulus frequency.缺氧对豚鼠 2f(1)-f(2)畸变产物水平的影响取决于刺激频率。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar;267(3):351-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1052-2. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
6
Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices.建筑行业学徒中由噪声引起的听力变化的前瞻性研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2005 May;62(5):309-17. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.018143.