Suppr超能文献

一项关于在芳香疗法中单独使用及混合使用的精油生物活性变化的研究。

A study of the changes in the bioactivity of essential oils used singly and as mixtures in aromatherapy.

作者信息

Lis-Balchin M, Deans S, Hart S

机构信息

School of Applied Science, South Bank University, London, UK.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 1997 Fall;3(3):249-56. doi: 10.1089/acm.1997.3.249.

Abstract

The assumption by aromatherapists that essential oils are more beneficial when applied as mixes of two or more was tested using several in vitro bioactivity parameters. These included assays against 25 different bacteria, pharmacological studies using a smooth muscle preparation (guinea-pig ileum) and also the predicted effect on the patient as a whole on the basis of chemical analysis (using gas chromatography). The results showed an enhancement in the antibacterial effect of some essential oils when used in mixes only when these were poor antibacterial agents on their own. The action on smooth muscle was often drastically changed when using mixes due to the combination of relaxant and contractile essential oils. A stimulant effect on patients was dependent almost entirely on a high monoterpene concentration. Due to the pharmacological changes achieved by mixing different essential oils, which cannot be predicted from animal studies, there is a possible danger in the indiscriminate usage of mixes on some susceptible patients, e.g., asthmatics and also during pregnancy and childbirth.

摘要

芳香疗法从业者认为,两种或更多种精油混合使用时更有益,这一假设通过若干体外生物活性参数进行了测试。这些参数包括针对25种不同细菌的检测、使用平滑肌制剂(豚鼠回肠)的药理学研究,以及基于化学分析(使用气相色谱法)对患者整体的预期效果。结果表明,某些精油单独使用时抗菌效果不佳,但混合使用时其抗菌效果会增强。由于松弛性和收缩性精油的组合,混合使用时对平滑肌的作用往往会发生巨大变化。对患者的刺激作用几乎完全取决于高浓度的单萜。由于混合不同精油会产生无法从动物研究中预测的药理变化,在一些易感患者(如哮喘患者)以及孕期和分娩期间不加区分地使用混合精油可能存在危险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验