Kim S G, Tsekos N V, Ashe J
Center for Magnetic Resonance and Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
NMR Biomed. 1997 Jun-Aug;10(4-5):191-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5<191::aid-nbm460>3.0.co;2-r.
Perfusion-weighted imaging techniques employing blood water protons as an endogenous tracer have poor temporal resolution because each image should be acquired with an adequate spin 'tagging' time. Thus, perfusion-based functional magnetic resonance imaging studies are typically performed on a single slice. To alleviate this problem, a multi-slice flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery technique has been developed. Following a single inversion pulse and a delay time, multi-slice echo-planar images are acquired sequentially without any additional inter-image delay. Thus, the temporal resolution of multi-slice FAIR is almost identical to that of single slice techniques. The theoretical background for multi-slice FAIR is described in detail. The multi-slice FAIR technique has been successfully applied to obtain three-slice cerebral blood flow based functional images during motor tasks. The relative CBF change in the contralateral motor/sensory area during unilateral thumb-digit opposition is 45.0+/-12.2% (n=9), while the blood oxygenation level dependent signal change is 1.5+/-0.4 SD%. Relative changes of the oxygen consumption rate can be estimated from CBF and BOLD changes using FAIR. The BOLD signal change is not correlated with the relative CBF increase, and thus caution should be exercised when interpreting the BOLD change as a quantitative index of the CBF change, especially in inter-subject comparisons.
采用血水质子作为内源性示踪剂的灌注加权成像技术时间分辨率较差,因为每个图像都需要在有足够的自旋“标记”时间的情况下采集。因此,基于灌注的功能磁共振成像研究通常在单个层面上进行。为缓解这一问题,已开发出一种多层血流敏感交替反转恢复技术。在单个反转脉冲和延迟时间之后,依次采集多层回波平面图像,且图像间没有任何额外延迟。因此,多层FAIR的时间分辨率几乎与单层技术相同。详细描述了多层FAIR的理论背景。多层FAIR技术已成功应用于在运动任务期间获取基于三层脑血流量的功能图像。在单侧拇指对指运动期间,对侧运动/感觉区域的相对脑血流量变化为45.0±12.2%(n = 9),而血氧水平依赖信号变化为1.5±0.4标准差%。使用FAIR可根据脑血流量和血氧水平依赖变化估计氧消耗率的相对变化。血氧水平依赖信号变化与相对脑血流量增加不相关,因此在将血氧水平依赖变化解释为脑血流量变化的定量指标时应谨慎,尤其是在受试者间比较中。