Almasy L, Dyer T D, Blangero J
Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas 78245-0549, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):953-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<953::AID-GEPI65>3.0.CO;2-K.
Power to detect linkage and localization of a major gene were compared in univariate and bivariate variance components linkage analysis of three related quantitative traits in general pedigrees. Although both methods demonstrated adequate power to detect loci of moderate effect, bivariate analysis improved both power and localization for correlated quantitative traits mapping to the same chromosomal region, regardless of whether co-localization was the result of pleiotropy. Additionally, a test of pleiotropy versus co-incident linkage was shown to have adequate power and a low error rate.
在一般家系中对三个相关数量性状进行单变量和双变量方差成分连锁分析时,比较了检测主基因连锁和定位的效能。虽然两种方法在检测中等效应位点时都显示出足够的效能,但对于映射到同一染色体区域的相关数量性状,双变量分析提高了效能和定位精度,无论共定位是由多效性导致的。此外,一项关于多效性与巧合连锁的检验显示具有足够的效能和较低的错误率。