Proietti E, Greco G, Garrone B, Baccarini S, Mauri C, Venditti M, Carlei D, Belardelli F
Laboratory of Virology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome 00161, Italy.
J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 15;101(2):429-41. doi: 10.1172/JCI1348.
Cyclophosphamide (CTX) increases the antitumor effectiveness of adoptive immunotherapy in mice, and combined immunotherapy regimens are now used in some clinical trials. However, the mechanisms underlying the synergistic antitumor responses are still unclear. The purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate the antitumor response to CTX and adoptive immunotherapy in mice bearing four different syngeneic tumors (two responsive in vivo to CTX and two resistant); and (b) to define the mechanism(s) of the CTX-immunotherapy synergism. Tumor-bearing DBA/2 mice were treated with a single injection of CTX followed by an intravenous infusion of tumor-immune spleen cells. In all the four tumor models, a single CTX injection resulted in an impressive antitumor response to the subsequent injection of spleen cells from mice immunized with homologous tumor cells independently of the in vivo response to CTX alone. Detailed analysis of the antitumor mechanisms in mice transplanted with metastatic Friend leukemia cells revealed that (a) the effectiveness of this combined therapy was dependent neither on the CTX-induced reduction of tumor burden nor on CTX-induced inhibition of some putative tumor-induced suppressor cells; (b) the CTX/immune cells' regimen strongly protected the mice from subsequent injection of FLC, provided the animals were also preinoculated with inactivated homologous tumor together with the immune spleen cells; (c) CD4(+) T immune lymphocytes were the major cell type responsible for the antitumor activity; (d) the combined therapy was ineffective in mice treated with antiasialo-GM1 or anti-IFN-alpha/beta antibodies; (e) spleen and/ or bone marrow cells from CTX-treated mice produced soluble factors that assisted in proliferation of the spleen cells. Altogether, these results indicate that CTX acts via bystander effects, possibly through production of T cell growth factors occurring during the rebound events after drug administration, which may sustain the proliferation, survival, and activity of the transferred immune T lymphocytes. Thus, our findings indicate the need for reappraisal of the mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of CTX and adoptive immunotherapy, and may provide new insights into the definition of new and more effective strategies with chemotherapy and adoptive immunotherapy for cancer patients.
环磷酰胺(CTX)可增强小鼠过继性免疫疗法的抗肿瘤效果,目前一些临床试验中采用了联合免疫疗法方案。然而,协同抗肿瘤反应背后的机制仍不清楚。本研究的目的是:(a)评估携带四种不同同基因肿瘤(两种对CTX体内反应敏感,两种耐药)的小鼠对CTX和过继性免疫疗法的抗肿瘤反应;(b)确定CTX -免疫疗法协同作用的机制。给荷瘤DBA/2小鼠单次注射CTX,随后静脉输注肿瘤免疫脾细胞。在所有四种肿瘤模型中,单次注射CTX均对随后注射来自用同源肿瘤细胞免疫的小鼠的脾细胞产生了显著的抗肿瘤反应,这与单独对CTX的体内反应无关。对移植转移性弗氏白血病细胞的小鼠的抗肿瘤机制进行详细分析发现:(a)这种联合疗法的有效性既不依赖于CTX诱导的肿瘤负荷降低,也不依赖于CTX诱导的对某些假定的肿瘤诱导抑制细胞的抑制;(b)CTX/免疫细胞方案能强烈保护小鼠免受随后的FLC注射,前提是动物还与免疫脾细胞一起预先接种了灭活的同源肿瘤;(c)CD4(+) T免疫淋巴细胞是负责抗肿瘤活性的主要细胞类型;(d)联合疗法在用抗唾液酸GM1或抗IFN -α/β抗体处理的小鼠中无效;(e)CTX处理小鼠的脾和/或骨髓细胞产生了有助于脾细胞增殖的可溶性因子。总之,这些结果表明CTX通过旁观者效应起作用,可能是通过给药后反弹事件期间产生的T细胞生长因子,这可能维持转移免疫T淋巴细胞的增殖、存活和活性。因此,我们的研究结果表明需要重新评估CTX和过继性免疫疗法协同效应的潜在机制,并可能为定义针对癌症患者的化疗和过继性免疫疗法的新的更有效策略提供新的见解。