• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道前列腺切除术治疗尿潴留患者的抗生素预防

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with urinary retention undergoing transurethral prostatectomy.

作者信息

Lukkarinen O, Hellström P, Leppilahti M, Kontturi M, Tammela T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1997;86(3):239-42.

PMID:9435936
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The risk of severe infection and complications in connection with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has clearly increased in patients with urinary retention and an indwelling catheter. The aim of this study was to determine whether the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime are equally efficient in preventing infective complications in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An open randomized prospective study was carried out on 72 patients with urinary retention undergoing TURP, to compare of 500 mg of ciprofloxacin (CF) orally twice daily and 1 g of ceftazidime (CT) intravenously twice daily.

RESULTS

The incidence of early complications was 26% in the CF group and 17% in the CT group. All the complications were minor. On removal of the indwelling catheter, a positive urinary culture was detected in 6% of the patients in the CF group and in 3% in the CT group. One month after TURP, a positive urinary culture was detected in 14% of the patients in the CF group and in 18% of the CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that both of the antibiotics used in this trial were equally effective in the prevention of early urinary and other infections and also late complications, in patients with urinary retention undergoing TURP.

摘要

背景与目的

对于存在尿潴留且留置导尿管的患者,经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)相关的严重感染及并发症风险明显增加。本研究的目的是确定环丙沙星和头孢他啶这两种抗生素在预防这些患者感染性并发症方面是否同样有效。

材料与方法

对72例接受TURP的尿潴留患者进行了一项开放性随机前瞻性研究,比较每日口服两次500毫克环丙沙星(CF)与每日静脉注射两次1克头孢他啶(CT)的效果。

结果

CF组早期并发症发生率为26%,CT组为17%。所有并发症均为轻度。拔除留置导尿管时,CF组6%的患者尿培养呈阳性,CT组为3%。TURP术后1个月,CF组14%的患者尿培养呈阳性,CT组为18%。

结论

得出的结论是,在接受TURP的尿潴留患者中,本试验中使用的两种抗生素在预防早期泌尿系统及其他感染以及晚期并发症方面同样有效。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with urinary retention undergoing transurethral prostatectomy.经尿道前列腺切除术治疗尿潴留患者的抗生素预防
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1997;86(3):239-42.
2
Prospective, randomized, multicentric, open, comparative study on the efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin versus 1920 mg trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus a control group in patients undergoing TUR of the prostate.一项前瞻性、随机、多中心、开放性比较研究,旨在比较单剂量500毫克左氧氟沙星、1920毫克甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑与对照组对接受前列腺经尿道切除术患者的预防效果。
Eur Urol. 2005 Apr;47(4):549-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.004. Epub 2005 Jan 18.
3
Prospective randomized open study between ciprofloxacin and a combination of sulfadiazine and trimethoprim in antibiotic prophylaxis in connection with transurethral prostatectomy.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1996 Feb;30(1):33-6. doi: 10.3109/00365599609182346.
4
[Antibiotics in transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with low risk of infectious complications: randomized prospective comparative study].[低感染并发症风险患者经尿道前列腺切除术中抗生素的应用:随机前瞻性对照研究]
Arch Esp Urol. 2004 Jan-Feb;57(1):48-57.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.接受经尿道前列腺切除术患者的抗生素预防
Urology. 1996 Jun;47(6):852-6. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00066-0.
6
Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.用于管理住院成年患者短期排尿问题的尿道导管类型:Cochrane系统评价短版
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645.
7
Is there a role for antibiotic prophylaxis in transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy?抗生素预防在经会阴间质永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗中是否有作用?
Tech Urol. 2000 Jun;6(2):104-8.
8
[Efficacy of ciprofloxacine antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications after TUR of the prostate].[环丙沙星预防前列腺电切术后感染性并发症的疗效]
Urologiia. 2005 Sep-Oct(5):21-5.
9
Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in preventing bacteriuria caused by urodynamic study: a blind, randomized study of 192 patients.环丙沙星预防尿动力学检查所致菌尿的有效性:192例患者的一项盲法随机研究。
Urology. 2006 Jun;67(6):1149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.005.
10
A pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on the use of antibiotics on urinary catheter removal to reduce the rate of urinary tract infection: the pitfalls of ciprofloxacin.一项关于使用抗生素预防导尿管拔除后尿路感染发生率的前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验:环丙沙星的陷阱
BJU Int. 2004 Nov;94(7):1048-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05102.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Penetration of a single infusion of ampicillin and sulbactam into prostatic tissue during transurethral prostatectomy.经尿道前列腺切除术期间单次输注氨苄西林舒巴坦后在前列腺组织中的渗透情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 1999;31(2):203-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007128825726.