• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于C57BL/6J小鼠静脉注射乙醇条件性位置偏好的研究。

A study examining intravenous ethanol-conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice.

作者信息

Kelley B M, Bandy A L, Middaugh L D

机构信息

Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-0742, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Dec;21(9):1661-6.

PMID:9438527
Abstract

The reinforcing effects of intravenous (I.V.) ethanol were examined in C57BL/6J (C57) mice with a conditioned-place-preference (CPP) paradigm. Before CPP testing, adult mice underwent jugular catheterization. On the following day, subjects were acclimated to a two-compartment CPP chamber. A 15-min nondrug pretest was conducted to determine compartment preference. For the treatment group, I.V. ethanol [30% (v/v), 3.4 microl/min, 25 min] was paired with the nonpreferred compartment, whereas I.V. saline was paired with the preferred compartment. The control group received I.V. saline in both compartments. Two conditioning sessions were conducted per day (0900 and 1500), and the order of the infusions was counterbalanced across subjects. The drug-free posttest was identical to the pretest, except that it occurred on the day after the final drug/compartment pairing. The entire procedure required 6 days. After just two pairings with ethanol, with a cumulative ethanol dose of only 0.82 g/kg/day, significant CPP was noted in the treatment group, whereas no change in compartment preference was noted for the control group. A separate group of C57 mice were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal ethanol (1.5 g/kg) from saline using a two-lever drug discrimination paradigm. After training was complete, these mice also underwent jugular catheterization. Substitution testing was conducted with I.V. ethanol [30% (v/v), 6.4 microl/min, 12 min] and saline. The results indicate that the subjective effects of ethanol did not differ according to the route of administration. Together, these experiments provide evidence that ethanol is rewarding for C57 mice, as indexed by ethanol CPP, and that the subjective effects of intravenously and intraperitoneally administered ethanol are similar.

摘要

采用条件性位置偏爱(CPP)范式,在C57BL/6J(C57)小鼠中研究静脉注射(I.V.)乙醇的强化作用。在进行CPP测试前,成年小鼠接受颈静脉插管。次日,将实验对象置于两室CPP箱中使其适应环境。进行15分钟的非药物预测试以确定对箱室的偏爱。对于治疗组,静脉注射乙醇[30%(v/v),3.4微升/分钟,25分钟]与非偏爱箱室配对,而静脉注射生理盐水与偏爱箱室配对。对照组在两个箱室中均接受静脉注射生理盐水。每天进行两次条件训练(上午9点和下午3点),输注顺序在各实验对象间进行平衡处理。无药物后测试与预测试相同,只是在最后一次药物/箱室配对后的次日进行。整个过程需要6天。仅与乙醇配对两次后,乙醇累积剂量仅为0.82克/千克/天,治疗组即出现显著的CPP,而对照组对箱室的偏爱无变化。另一组C57小鼠采用双杠杆药物辨别范式训练,以辨别腹腔注射乙醇(1.5克/千克)和生理盐水。训练完成后,这些小鼠也接受颈静脉插管。用静脉注射乙醇[30%(v/v),6.4微升/分钟,12分钟]和生理盐水进行替代测试。结果表明,乙醇的主观效应不因给药途径而异。总之,这些实验提供了证据,表明以乙醇CPP为指标,乙醇对C57小鼠具有奖赏作用,且静脉注射和腹腔注射乙醇的主观效应相似。

相似文献

1
A study examining intravenous ethanol-conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice.一项关于C57BL/6J小鼠静脉注射乙醇条件性位置偏好的研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Dec;21(9):1661-6.
2
Ethanol consumption and place-preference conditioning in the alcohol-preferring C57BL/6 mouse: relationship with motor activity patterns.酒精偏好型C57BL/6小鼠的乙醇摄入与位置偏好条件反射:与运动活动模式的关系
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Apr;23(4):683-92.
3
Effects of ethanol on nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J mice.乙醇对C57BL/6J小鼠中尼古丁诱导的条件性位置偏爱效应的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Sep 30;30(7):1283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.04.024.
4
Conditioned effects produced by naltrexone doses that reduce ethanol-reinforced responding in rhesus monkeys.纳曲酮剂量产生的条件性效应,该剂量可降低恒河猴中乙醇强化的反应。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Apr;23(4):708-15.
5
Cocaine, but not alcohol, reinstates cocaine-induced place preferences.可卡因能恢复由可卡因诱导产生的位置偏好,而酒精则不能。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Aug;78(4):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.05.020.
6
An antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to the mu opioid receptor attenuates cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and reward in mice.一种针对μ阿片受体的反义寡脱氧核苷酸可减轻可卡因诱导的小鼠行为敏化和奖赏效应。
Neuroscience. 2006 Oct 13;142(2):481-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
7
Ethanol self-administration and ethanol conditioned place preference are reduced in mice lacking cannabinoid CB1 receptors.在缺乏大麻素CB1受体的小鼠中,乙醇自我给药和乙醇条件性位置偏爱行为减少。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Nov 7;164(2):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.021.
8
Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol.吗啡和乙醇的奖赏及激活作用中的基因差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;107(2-3):385-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02245166.
9
Effects of multi-modal cues on conditioned place preference in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.多模态线索对 C57BL/6J 和 DBA/2J 小鼠条件性位置偏爱形成的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Dec;235(12):3535-3543. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5078-2. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
10
Nicotine place preference in a biased conditioned place preference design.在偏向性条件性位置偏好设计中的尼古丁位置偏好
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008 Mar;89(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.11.005. Epub 2007 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cannabinoid-1 receptor neutral antagonist reduces binge-like alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced accumbal dopaminergic signaling.大麻素 1 型受体中性拮抗剂可减少 binge-like 酒精消费和酒精引起的伏隔核多巴胺能信号。
Neuropharmacology. 2018 Mar 15;131:200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Intravenous alcohol self-administration in the P rat.P大鼠静脉注射酒精自我给药
Alcohol. 2014 Aug;48(5):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Endogenous kappa-opioid mediation of stress-induced potentiation of ethanol-conditioned place preference and self-administration.
内源性 κ 阿片肽介导应激诱导的乙醇条件性位置偏爱和自我给药的增强作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jun;210(2):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1844-5. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
4
Motivational effects of ethanol in DARPP-32 knock-out mice.乙醇对DARPP - 32基因敲除小鼠的动机效应。
J Neurosci. 2001 Jan 1;21(1):340-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00340.2001.