Ferreira Zandoná A G, Analoui M, Schemehorn B R, Eckert G J, Stookey G K
Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Caries Res. 1998;32(1):31-40. doi: 10.1159/000016427.
Laser fluorescence (LF) has been used previously to detect early smooth-surface lesions. Although its use for detection of occlusal demineralization has been implicated, it has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to determine whether LF could detect demineralization in the base of artificial fissures. To employ LF for detection of occlusal demineralization an apparatus was devised to direct laser light into fissures and simultaneously detect fluorescence from the base of the fissures. Three groups (n = 40/group) of differing fissure types were prepared (straight wall, converging and diverging wall) with either a sound or lesioned base. One half of each group was examined with LF and dye-enhanced LF (DELF); the other half was examined with LF, exposed to plaque, examined with LF and DELF, air-polished and examined with DELF. All images were scored twice as either (1) carious; (2) sound, or (3) undetermined, by a group of 3 examiners. For fissures without plaque, the average sensitivity was higher for DELF (0.76) than for LF (0.54) (p < 0.05). Likewise, the average specificity was higher for DELF (0.64) than for LF (0.29) (p < 0.05). In the presence of plaque, sensitivity was higher for DELF (0.91) compared to LF (0.43); however, specificity was lower for DELF (0.05) compared to LF (0.55). When the fissures were air-polished and then examined with DELF, sensitivity averaged 0.82 (p < 0.05), and specificity increased consistently (average 0.51, p < 0.05). It was concluded that, in the absence of plaque, DELF was a better diagnostic tool than LF for detection of demineralization in artificial fissures.
激光荧光(LF)此前已用于检测早期平滑面病变。尽管其用于检测咬合面脱矿已有相关报道,但尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是确定LF是否能检测人工裂隙底部的脱矿情况。为了将LF用于检测咬合面脱矿,设计了一种装置,将激光引导至裂隙中,并同时检测裂隙底部发出的荧光。制备了三组(每组n = 40)不同类型的裂隙(直壁、会聚壁和发散壁),其底部有健康的或有病变的。每组的一半用LF和染料增强激光荧光(DELF)进行检查;另一半先用LF检查,暴露于菌斑后,再用LF和DELF检查,进行空气抛光后用DELF检查。一组3名检查者将所有图像评分两次,分为(1)龋损;(2)健康,或(3)不确定。对于没有菌斑的裂隙,DELF的平均敏感度(0.76)高于LF(0.54)(p < 0.05)。同样,DELF的平均特异度(0.64)高于LF(0.29)(p < 0.05)。在有菌斑的情况下,DELF的敏感度(0.