• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解读健康相关生活质量评分变化的意义。

Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

作者信息

Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J

机构信息

British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139
PMID:9440735
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the significance to patients of changes in health-related quality-of-life (HLQ) scores assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A subjective significance questionnaire (SSQ), which asks patients about perceived changes in physical, emotional, and social functioning and in global quality of life (global QL) and the QLQ-C30 were completed by patients who received chemotherapy for either breast cancer or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In the SSQ, patients rated their perception of change since the last time they completed the QLQ-C30 using a 7-category scale that ranged from "much worse" through "no change" to "much better." For each category of change in the SSQ, the corresponding differences were calculated in QLQ-C30 mean scores and effect sizes were determined.

RESULTS

For patients who indicated "no change" in the SSQ, the mean change in scores in the corresponding QLQ-C30 domains was not significantly different from 0. For patients who indicated "a little" change either for better or for worse, the mean change in scores was about 5 to 10; for "moderate" change, about 10 to 20; and for "very much" change, greater than 20. Effect sizes increased in concordance with increasing changes in SSQ ratings and QLQ-C30 scores.

CONCLUSION

The significance of changes in QLQ-C30 scores can be interpreted in terms of small, moderate, or large changes in quality of life as reported by patients in the SSQ. The magnitude of these changes also can be used to calculate the sample sizes required to detect a specified change in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)评估的健康相关生活质量(HLQ)得分变化对患者的意义。

患者与方法

一份主观意义问卷(SSQ),询问患者身体、情感和社会功能以及总体生活质量(总体QL)的感知变化,QLQ-C30由接受乳腺癌或小细胞肺癌(SCLC)化疗的患者完成。在SSQ中,患者使用从“差得多”到“无变化”再到“好得多”的7级量表对自上次完成QLQ-C30以来的变化感知进行评分。对于SSQ中每一类变化,计算QLQ-C30平均得分的相应差异并确定效应大小。

结果

对于在SSQ中表示“无变化”的患者,相应QLQ-C30领域得分的平均变化与0无显著差异。对于表示“稍有”变好或变差的患者,得分的平均变化约为5至10;对于“中度”变化,约为10至20;对于“非常大”的变化,大于20。效应大小随着SSQ评分和QLQ-C30得分变化的增加而增加。

结论

QLQ-C30得分变化的意义可以根据患者在SSQ中报告的生活质量的小、中或大变化来解释。这些变化的幅度也可用于计算临床试验中检测特定变化所需的样本量。

相似文献

1
Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.解读健康相关生活质量评分变化的意义。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139.
2
Interpreting the Significance of Changes in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores.解读健康相关生活质量评分变化的意义。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec 10;41(35):5345-5350. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02776.
3
The relationship of changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to ratings on the Subjective Significance Questionnaire in men with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)评分变化与主观重要性问卷评分之间的关系。
Qual Life Res. 2004 Sep;13(7):1235-46. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000037494.27127.b5.
4
Patient self-appraisal of change and minimal clinically important difference on the European organization for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 before and during cancer therapy.癌症治疗前后欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心 30 问卷患者自评变化和最小临床重要差异。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Mar 28;13:165. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-165.
5
Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials.解读参与随机对照试验的肺癌患者 EORTC QLQ-C30 健康相关生活质量评分的最小有意义差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1016-5. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
6
Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)在乳腺癌、卵巢癌和肺癌患者中的心理测量特性及反应性
Qual Life Res. 1994 Oct;3(5):353-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00451727.
7
Interpreting the meaningfulness of changes in health-related quality of life scores: lessons from studies in adults.解读健康相关生活质量评分变化的意义:来自成人研究的经验教训。
Int J Cancer Suppl. 1999;12:132-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<132::aid-ijc23>3.0.co;2-4.
8
Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients' supportive care needs.识别欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC-QLQ-C30)评分的变化,这些变化代表患者支持性护理需求的变化。
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1207-16. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0853-y. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
9
Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.解释欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷核心 30 评分在卵巢癌患者中的最小重要差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
10
Establishing Meaningful Change Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in ALTA-1L Trial.在 ALTA-1L 试验中,建立间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌患者报告结局中的有意义变化阈值。
Value Health. 2024 Feb;27(2):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).社区居住老年人生活质量的年龄相关轨迹:来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)的发现。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Aug 20;17:1632607. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632607. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating Nutrition and Supportive Care Needs in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Survey.调查食管癌和胃癌幸存者的营养与支持性护理需求:一项横断面调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;13(16):2057. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162057.
3
Adverse health outcomes for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy combined with androgen-deprivation therapy: A population-based, controlled study, from Norway.
接受放疗联合雄激素剥夺疗法的前列腺癌患者的不良健康结局:一项基于挪威人群的对照研究。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Aug 25;64:1109-1116. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42825.
4
Toripalimab Combination Therapy Without Concurrent Cisplatin for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.特瑞普利单抗联合疗法治疗鼻咽癌时不联合顺铂:DIAMOND随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.13205.
5
Impact of Empowerment Education Concept Plus Humanistic Care on Moods and Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.赋能教育理念加人文关怀对肺癌化疗患者情绪及生活质量的影响
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Jun 5;35(3):275-284. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2025.241011.
6
Survival, quality of life, and motor function in brain metastases surgery: The role of complete resection.脑转移瘤手术中的生存、生活质量及运动功能:完全切除的作用。
Neurooncol Pract. 2025 Jan 31;12(4):644-653. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaf011. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Quality of Life Identifies High-Risk Groups in Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients.生活质量可识别晚期直肠癌患者中的高危群体。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1782. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151782.
8
Challenges in interpreting individual-level changes in health-related quality of life in patients with glioma using minimally important differences (MIDs) and a 4-point Likert scale.使用最小重要差异(MIDs)和4点李克特量表解释神经胶质瘤患者健康相关生活质量个体水平变化时面临的挑战。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04029-3.
9
Patient-reported outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer.肛管癌放化疗后的患者报告结局
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jul 30;64:1005-1013. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43636.
10
Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Pozelimab and Cemdisiran Combination in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.泊泽利单抗与西姆地西单抗联合治疗阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症患者的2期随机试验的安全性、有效性及患者报告结局
EJHaem. 2025 Jul 24;6(4):e70095. doi: 10.1002/jha2.70095. eCollection 2025 Aug.