Suppr超能文献

针对住院医师问诊的强化培训效果。一项随机对照研究。

The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study.

作者信息

Smith R C, Lyles J S, Mettler J, Stoffelmayr B E, Van Egeren L F, Marshall A A, Gardiner J C, Maduschke K M, Stanley J M, Osborn G G, Shebroe V, Greenbaum R B

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1998 Jan 15;128(2):118-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interviewing and the physician-patient relationship are crucial elements of medical care, but residencies provide little formal instruction in these areas.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of a training program in interviewing on 1) residents' attitudes toward and skills in interviewing and 2) patients' physical and psychosocial well-being and satisfaction with care.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Two university-based primary care residencies.

PARTICIPANTS

63 primary care residents in postgraduate year 1.

INTERVENTION

A 1-month, full-time rotation in interviewing and related psychosocial topics.

MEASUREMENTS

Residents and their patients were assessed before and after the 1-month rotation. Questionnaires were used to assess residents' commitment to interviewing and psychosocial medicine, estimate of the importance of such care, and confidence in their ability to provide such care. Knowledge of interviewing and psychosocial medicine was assessed with a multiple-choice test. Audiotaped interviews with real patients and videotaped interviews with simulated patients were rated for specific interviewing behaviors. Patients' anxiety, depression, and social dysfunction; role limitations; somatic symptom status; and levels of satisfaction with medical visits were assessed by questionnaires and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Trained residents were superior to untrained residents in knowledge (difference in adjusted post-test mean scores, 15.7% [95% CI, 11% to 20%]); attitudes, such as confidence in psychological sensitivity (difference, 0.61 points on a 7-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 0.91 points]); somatization management (difference, 0.99 points [CI, 0.64 to 1.35 points]); interviewing of real patients (difference, 1.39 points on an 11-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 2.45 points]); and interviewing (data gathering) of simulated patients (difference, 2.67 points [CI, 1.77 to 3.56 points]). Mean differences between the study groups were consistently in the appropriate direction for patient satisfaction and patient well-being, but effect sizes were too small to be considered meaningful.

CONCLUSION

An intensive 1-month training rotation in interviewing improved residents' knowledge about, attitudes toward, and skills in interviewing.

摘要

背景

问诊及医患关系是医疗护理的关键要素,但住院医师培训项目在这些方面提供的正规指导很少。

目的

确定一项问诊培训项目对以下两方面的影响:1)住院医师对问诊的态度和技能;2)患者的身体及心理社会健康状况以及对护理的满意度。

设计

随机对照研究。

地点

两个大学附属医院的基层医疗住院医师培训项目。

参与者

63名一年级基层医疗住院医师。

干预措施

为期1个月的关于问诊及相关心理社会主题的全日制轮转培训。

测量指标

在1个月轮转培训前后对住院医师及其患者进行评估。使用问卷评估住院医师对问诊及心理社会医学的投入程度、对这类护理重要性的估计以及提供此类护理的信心。通过多项选择题测试评估问诊及心理社会医学知识。对与真实患者的录音访谈和与模拟患者的录像访谈进行特定问诊行为评分。通过问卷和电话访谈评估患者的焦虑、抑郁和社会功能障碍;角色限制;躯体症状状况;以及对就诊的满意度。

结果

经过培训的住院医师在知识方面(调整后测试平均分的差异为15.7%[95%CI,11%至20%])优于未经过培训的住院医师;在态度方面,如心理敏感度的信心(差异为7分制量表上的0.61分[CI,0.32至0.91分]);躯体化管理(差异为0.99分[CI,0.64至1.35分]);对真实患者的问诊(差异为11分制量表上的1.39分[CI,0.32至2.45分]);以及对模拟患者的问诊(收集数据)(差异为2.67分[CI,1.77至3.56分])。研究组之间的平均差异在患者满意度和患者健康状况方面始终朝着合适的方向,但效应量过小,无实际意义。

结论

为期1个月的强化问诊培训轮转提高了住院医师关于问诊的知识、态度和技能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验