Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S
Department of Public Health (Women's Health), Greater Glasgow Health Board, UK.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jan;105(1):45-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09349.x.
To determine the indications for singleton caesarean sections in Scotland in 1994.
Prospective survey of singleton caesarean sections using information provided by clinicians entering data onto a computer in labour wards.
Twenty-three consultant-led obstetric units in Scotland.
Women undergoing caesarean section in participating Scottish maternity units during 1994.
Using routinely collected data it was found that the caesarean section rate varied by maternal age, parity, gestation, history of previous section and hospital of delivery, but there was no difference by area of deprivation. 87.4% (8369/9573) of Scottish caesarean sections were included in the survey of which 8098 were in women with singleton pregnancies. Most singleton caesarean sections were undertaken in primiparae (50.5%), 31.2% were in women with a history of previous section and 18.3% were in multiparous women who had not had a previous section; 38.9% of the operations were elective, 13.9% were emergencies before labour and 47.2% were emergencies during labour. Four main indications--elective section for breech presentation (10.7% of all sections); emergency caesarean section before labour because of fetal problems (2.8%); emergency caesarean section during labour for fetal distress and/or failure to progress (30.3%); repeat section for reasons other than above (16.2%) accounted for 60% of all caesarean sections in women with no other recorded complications. 7.7% of all singleton caesarean sections (19.8% of elective operations) were associated with maternal request for the operation.
The survey has identified why caesarean sections are performed by Scottish obstetricians and highlighted some areas where there would be scope to increase the vaginal delivery rate. Before this can be attempted, agreement must be reached by clinicians about effective management of particular problems. Women also need to have ready access to evidenced-based information about caesarean section.
确定1994年苏格兰单胎剖宫产的指征。
采用临床医生在产房将数据录入计算机所提供的信息,对单胎剖宫产进行前瞻性调查。
苏格兰23个由顾问医生主导的产科单位。
1994年在参与调查的苏格兰产科单位接受剖宫产的妇女。
通过常规收集的数据发现,剖宫产率因产妇年龄、产次、孕周、既往剖宫产史及分娩医院而异,但在贫困地区并无差异。苏格兰剖宫产中有87.4%(8369/9573)纳入了该调查,其中8098例为单胎妊娠妇女。大多数单胎剖宫产是在初产妇中进行的(50.5%),31.2%是有既往剖宫产史的妇女,18.3%是无既往剖宫产史的经产妇;38.9%的手术是选择性的,13.9%是临产前的急诊手术,47.2%是分娩期间的急诊手术。四个主要指征——因臀位行选择性剖宫产(占所有剖宫产的10.7%);因胎儿问题临产前急诊剖宫产(2.8%);因胎儿窘迫和/或产程无进展在分娩期间急诊剖宫产(30.3%);因上述以外原因行再次剖宫产(16.2%),占无其他记录并发症妇女所有剖宫产的60%。所有单胎剖宫产中有7.7%(选择性手术的19.8%)与产妇要求手术有关。
该调查明确了苏格兰产科医生进行剖宫产的原因,并突出了一些有望提高阴道分娩率的领域。在尝试这样做之前,临床医生必须就特定问题的有效管理达成共识。妇女还需要能够方便地获取有关剖宫产的循证信息。