Suppr超能文献

学龄前和学龄早期儿童锂剂量方法的比较。

Comparison of lithium dosage methods for preschool- and early school-age children.

作者信息

Hagino O R, Weller E B, Weller R A, Fristad M A

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;37(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199801000-00018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lithium may be useful in the treatment of prepubertal children with bipolar disorder or aggressive conduct disorder. However, there are few dosage guidelines. This study compares two dosage methods reported for prescribing lithium to prepubertal children: (1) a weight-based dosing schedule and (2) a single-dose, kinetics-based method.

METHOD

Lithium doses were calculated using each method and then compared with doses actually used in the clinical care of hospitalized children.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between mean lithium dose estimates calculated by the two methods. Average lithium dose estimates for both kinetic and weight-based methods were less than the observed discharge doses. Differences were seen between the two methods for children weighing between 25 and 30 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight-based dosing schedule and the single-dose, kinetics-based methods for calculating lithium dose result in similar dosage estimates when applied to young children.

摘要

目的

锂盐可能对治疗青春期前患有双相情感障碍或攻击性行为障碍的儿童有用。然而,剂量指南却很少。本研究比较了两种给青春期前儿童开锂盐的剂量方法:(1)基于体重的给药方案和(2)基于动力学的单剂量方法。

方法

使用每种方法计算锂盐剂量,然后与住院儿童临床护理中实际使用的剂量进行比较。

结果

两种方法计算出的平均锂盐剂量估计值之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。基于动力学和基于体重的方法的平均锂盐剂量估计值均低于观察到的出院剂量。体重在25至30千克之间的儿童,两种方法之间存在差异。

结论

当应用于幼儿时,基于体重的给药方案和基于动力学的单剂量锂盐计算方法会得出相似的剂量估计值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验