• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前和学龄早期儿童锂剂量方法的比较。

Comparison of lithium dosage methods for preschool- and early school-age children.

作者信息

Hagino O R, Weller E B, Weller R A, Fristad M A

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;37(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199801000-00018.

DOI:10.1097/00004583-199801000-00018
PMID:9444901
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lithium may be useful in the treatment of prepubertal children with bipolar disorder or aggressive conduct disorder. However, there are few dosage guidelines. This study compares two dosage methods reported for prescribing lithium to prepubertal children: (1) a weight-based dosing schedule and (2) a single-dose, kinetics-based method.

METHOD

Lithium doses were calculated using each method and then compared with doses actually used in the clinical care of hospitalized children.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between mean lithium dose estimates calculated by the two methods. Average lithium dose estimates for both kinetic and weight-based methods were less than the observed discharge doses. Differences were seen between the two methods for children weighing between 25 and 30 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight-based dosing schedule and the single-dose, kinetics-based methods for calculating lithium dose result in similar dosage estimates when applied to young children.

摘要

目的

锂盐可能对治疗青春期前患有双相情感障碍或攻击性行为障碍的儿童有用。然而,剂量指南却很少。本研究比较了两种给青春期前儿童开锂盐的剂量方法:(1)基于体重的给药方案和(2)基于动力学的单剂量方法。

方法

使用每种方法计算锂盐剂量,然后与住院儿童临床护理中实际使用的剂量进行比较。

结果

两种方法计算出的平均锂盐剂量估计值之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。基于动力学和基于体重的方法的平均锂盐剂量估计值均低于观察到的出院剂量。体重在25至30千克之间的儿童,两种方法之间存在差异。

结论

当应用于幼儿时,基于体重的给药方案和基于动力学的单剂量锂盐计算方法会得出相似的剂量估计值。

相似文献

1
Comparison of lithium dosage methods for preschool- and early school-age children.学龄前和学龄早期儿童锂剂量方法的比较。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;37(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199801000-00018.
2
Stutter exacerbated by lithium in a pediatric patient with bipolar disorder.锂致双相障碍儿科患者口吃加重。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;45(10):e57. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q140. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
3
Quetiapine in the treatment of acute mania: target dose for efficacious treatment.喹硫平治疗急性躁狂症:有效治疗的目标剂量
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
4
Application of the Cockcroft-Gault method to estimate lithium dosage requirement.应用Cockcroft-Gault方法估算锂剂量需求。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Jun;61(3):269-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01654.x.
5
A simple mathematical model for predicting lithium dose requirement.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;44(4):144-5.
6
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (adderall XR) in the management of oppositional defiant disorder with or without comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children and adolescents: A 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, forced-dose-escalation study.缓释混合苯丙胺盐(安非他明XR)治疗学龄儿童和青少年对立违抗性障碍(伴或不伴注意力缺陷多动障碍共病)的疗效和安全性:一项为期4周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照、强制剂量递增研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):402-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.006.
7
Untoward effects of lithium treatment in children aged four through six years.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;34(12):1584-90. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199512000-00008.
8
Effectiveness and medical costs of divalproex versus lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder: results of a naturalistic clinical trial.丙戊酸镁与锂盐治疗双相情感障碍的疗效及医疗费用:一项自然临床试验的结果
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.002.
9
A novel slow-release formulation of lithium carbonate (Carbolithium Once-A-Day) vs. standard Carbolithium: a comparative pharmacokinetic study.碳酸锂新型缓释制剂(每日一次卡马西平)与标准卡马西平的比较:一项药代动力学对比研究。
Clin Ter. 2002 Mar-Apr;153(2):107-15.
10
Relationship between patient variables and lithium dosage requirements.患者变量与锂剂量需求之间的关系。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;46(4):133-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Lithium in Paediatric Patients with Bipolar Disorder: Implications for Selection of Dosage Regimens via Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics.双相情感障碍儿科患者中的锂盐:通过群体药代动力学/药效学对剂量方案选择的影响
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Jan;56(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0430-3.
2
Dosing strategies for lithium monotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar I disorder.用于治疗儿童和青少年双相I型障碍的锂盐单药治疗的给药策略。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jun;21(3):195-205. doi: 10.1089/cap.2010.0084.
3
Management options for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.
儿童和青少年双相情感障碍的治疗选择
Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(5):277-94. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507050-00002.
4
Bipolar disorder in youth.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2000 Apr;2(2):90-4. doi: 10.1007/s11920-000-0051-1.