de Jong K J, Abraham-Inpijn L, Vinckier F, Declerck D
Department of General Pathology and Internal Medicine, Academic Centre Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.
Int Dent J. 1997 Feb;47(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.1997.tb00672.x.
The aim of this study was to establish whether a patient-administered medical risk-related history (MRRH) for dental patients was valid. The MRRH, which was developed in the Netherlands, has now been tested in Belgium, where it was completed by total of 99 patients. Their answers were compared with the results of a verbal history, taken by a physician experienced in pre-assessment control. This verbal history was considered the 'gold standard'. The sensitivity and specificity of the medical questionnaire proved to be sufficiently high (88 per cent and 98 per cent respectively) and Cohen's Kappa displayed close agreement (0.87). These figures were only slightly lower than those obtained in Holland. The MRRH is valid for the registration of medical problems in dental patients but the answers need to be checked personally by the dental practitioner. Since the present trial was a limited one, the study will be expanded to nine countries in Europe.
本研究的目的是确定牙科患者自行填写的医疗风险相关病史(MRRH)是否有效。MRRH是在荷兰开发的,目前已在比利时进行测试,共有99名患者完成了该测试。将他们的答案与由一名在预评估控制方面经验丰富的医生进行的口头病史结果进行比较。这种口头病史被视为“金标准”。医疗问卷的敏感性和特异性证明足够高(分别为88%和98%),科恩kappa系数显示出高度一致性(0.87)。这些数字仅略低于在荷兰获得的数字。MRRH对于登记牙科患者的医疗问题是有效的,但答案需要由牙科医生亲自检查。由于目前的试验规模有限,该研究将扩展到欧洲的九个国家。