Singh G D, McNamara J A, Lozanoff S
Department of Dental Surgery and Periodontology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
J Anat. 1997 Nov;191 ( Pt 4)(Pt 4):595-602. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19140595.x.
This study determines deformations of the midface that contribute to a class III appearance, employing thinplate spline analysis. A total of 135 lateral cephalographs of prepubertal children of European-American descent with either class III malocclusions or a class I molar occlusion were compared. The cephalographs were traced and checked, and 7 homologous landmarks of the midface were identified and digitised. The data sets were scaled to an equivalent size and subjected to Procrustes analysis. These statistical tests indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) between the averaged class I and class III morphologies. Thinplate spline analysis indicated that both affine and nonaffine transformations contribute towards the total spline for the averaged midfacial configuration. For nonaffine transformations, partial warp 3 had the highest magnitude, indicating the large scale deformations of the midfacial configuration. These deformations affected the palatal landmarks, and were associated with compression of the midfacial complex in the anteroposterior plane predominantly. Partial warp 4 produced some vertical compression of the posterior aspect of the midfacial complex whereas partial warps 1 and 2 indicated localised shape changes of the maxillary alveolus region. large spatial-scale deformations therefore affect the midfacial complex in an anteroposterior axis, in combination with vertical compression and localised distortions. These deformations may represent a developmental diminution of the palatal complex anteroposteriorly that, allied with vertical shortening of midfacial height posteriorly, results in class III malocclusions with a retrusive midfacial profile.
本研究采用薄板样条分析确定导致Ⅲ类面型的面中部变形情况。共比较了135张欧美裔青春期前儿童的头颅侧位片,这些儿童患有Ⅲ类错牙合或Ⅰ类磨牙关系。对头颅侧位片进行描图和检查,确定并数字化面中部的7个同源标志点。将数据集缩放到相同大小并进行普氏分析。这些统计测试表明,平均Ⅰ类和Ⅲ类形态之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。薄板样条分析表明,仿射变换和非仿射变换都对平均面中部构型的总样条有贡献。对于非仿射变换,局部变形3的幅度最大,表明面中部构型存在大规模变形。这些变形影响腭部标志点,主要与面中部复合体在前后平面的压缩有关。局部变形4导致面中部复合体后部出现一些垂直压缩,而局部变形1和2表明上颌牙槽区域存在局部形状变化。因此,大空间尺度的变形在前后轴上影响面中部复合体,同时伴有垂直压缩和局部扭曲。这些变形可能代表腭复合体在前后方向上的发育性减小,再加上面中部高度在后部的垂直缩短,导致面中部后缩的Ⅲ类错牙合。