• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术。

Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.

作者信息

Lacerda-Filho A, Cunha-Melo J R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):935-40.

PMID:9449447
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare early and late results and costs of outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia with those of inpatient haemorrhoidectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective study with historical controls.

SETTING

University hospital, Brazil.

SUBJECTS

51 patients who required haemorrhoidectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Early and late results and comparative costs.

RESULTS

One patient was withdrawn from the study because of hypertension and subsequently lost to follow-up. The remaining 50 patients were discharged a mean of 68 (23) minutes after operation. Twelve patients complained of severe pain, one had faecal impaction and 2 developed bleeding. One patient developed urinary retention, compared with 18 in the historical group (p < 0.001). Forty-two patients (84%) were thoroughly satisfied with their treatment. Late complications did not differ significantly from those observed in the historical group. The estimated hospital costs were US$ 313.6 for outpatient, and US$ 716 for inpatient treatment.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia was safe and comfortable for most patients, with complication rates comparable to or better than those observed after inpatient treatment and at less than half the cost.

摘要

目的

比较局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术与住院痔切除术的早期和晚期结果及费用。

设计

有历史对照的前瞻性研究。

地点

巴西大学医院。

研究对象

51例需要进行痔切除术的患者。

干预措施

局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术。

主要观察指标

早期和晚期结果及比较费用。

结果

1例患者因高血压退出研究,随后失访。其余50例患者术后平均68(23)分钟出院。12例患者主诉严重疼痛,1例出现粪便嵌塞,2例出现出血。1例患者发生尿潴留,而历史对照组有18例(p<0.001)。42例患者(84%)对治疗非常满意。晚期并发症与历史对照组观察到的情况无显著差异。门诊治疗的估计医院费用为313.6美元,住院治疗为716美元。

结论

局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术对大多数患者来说安全且舒适,并发症发生率与住院治疗后观察到的相当或更好,且费用不到住院治疗的一半。

相似文献

1
Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术。
Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):935-40.
2
Office haemorrhoidectomy with local anaesthesia: a feasible day-case procedure.局部麻醉下门诊痔切除术:一种可行的日间手术。
Trop Doct. 2009 Apr;39(2):69-70. doi: 10.1258/td.2008.080128.
3
Day case haemorrhoidectomy in a developing country.发展中国家的日间痔切除术
Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Mar;12(1):51-3.
4
Ambulatory circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under regional anaesthesia.局部麻醉下门诊环形吻合器痔切除术与区域麻醉下环形吻合器痔切除术的比较
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Apr;75(4):184-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03330.x.
5
Day-case haemorrhoidectomy.
Br J Surg. 1999 Feb;86(2):255-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01024.x.
6
Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently.局部麻醉下吻合器痔切除术可安全且经济高效地进行。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1164-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0550-y. Epub 2004 May 19.
7
Haemorrhoidectomy by vessel sealing system under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting: preliminary experience.在局部麻醉下采用血管密封系统进行痔切除术:初步经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Mar;12(3):236-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01833.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
8
Feasibility of local infiltration anaesthesia for recurrent groin hernia repair.局部浸润麻醉用于复发性腹股沟疝修补术的可行性
Eur J Surg. 2001 Nov;167(11):851-4. doi: 10.1080/11024150152717698.
9
Cost-minimisation analysis of vaginal wall repair in an inpatient or outpatient regimen.住院或门诊治疗方案中阴道壁修复的成本最小化分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):473-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340701207641.
10
[Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature].
Ann Chir. 2004 Dec;129(10):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.05.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits of flavonoid and metronidazole use after excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.切除痔术后使用黄酮类和甲硝唑的益处:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;25(8):949-955. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02465-0. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
How to do open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia and its comparison with spinal anesthesia.如何在局部麻醉下进行开放性痔切除术及其与脊髓麻醉的比较。
Indian J Surg. 2012 Aug;74(4):330-3. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0438-3. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
3
Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region.
拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康经济评估推广的障碍。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):919-29. doi: 10.2165/11313670-000000000-00000.
4
Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids.橡皮圈套扎术与外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD005034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005034.pub2.