Suppr超能文献

布鲁氏菌病患者中的抗磷脂酰胆碱抗体。

Anti-phosphatidylcholine antibodies in patients with brucellosis.

作者信息

Casao M A, Leiva J, Diaz R, Gamazo C

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1998 Jan;47(1):49-54. doi: 10.1099/00222615-47-1-49.

Abstract

An indirect ELISA was adapted to measure individual classes of anti-phosphatidylcholine (PC) antibodies in patients with brucellosis; a comparison was made with patients with other infectious diseases and healthy human controls. Immunoconjugates of alpha, gamma or mu chain specificity were used. The results were compared with those of conventional tests for brucella antibodies, Rose Bengal, microagglutination (MAT) and Coombs tests, as well as with VDRL. The results indicated that although all sera from patients with brucellosis were VDRL negative, 97% of them (30 of 31) had higher levels of IgA or IgG anti-PC antibodies than the healthy control group. The IgM anti-PC antibodies isotype was not discriminatory between both groups. Seven sera (19%) from patients with other infections had values of IgG anti-PC higher than those of the healthy group; three of them were VDRL positive. The mean ELISA values of IgG and IgA anti-PC (serum diluted 1 in 1600) in the brucellosis and healthy groups were: IgG, 0.80 SEM 0.17 versus 0.23 SEM 0.10; and IgA, 0.86 SEM 0.26 versus 0.35 SEM 0.15. The sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA-PC were: IgG, 96.8% and 96.5%, respectively; IgA, 90.3% and 89.7%, respectively. Only one of 14 individuals clinically cured from brucellosis had significant IgG anti-PC antibodies. In contrast, all of these patients gave positive values in the conventional test for brucellosis. No correlation was found between the serum levels of IgA, IgG anti-PC by ELISA-PC and the results of the MAT or Coombs tests.

摘要

采用间接酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测布鲁氏菌病患者体内各类抗磷脂酰胆碱(PC)抗体;并与其他传染病患者及健康对照人群进行比较。使用了具有α、γ或μ链特异性的免疫缀合物。将结果与布鲁氏菌抗体的传统检测方法(玫瑰红试验、微量凝集试验(MAT)和库姆斯试验)以及性病研究实验室试验(VDRL)的结果进行比较。结果表明,尽管所有布鲁氏菌病患者的血清VDRL试验均为阴性,但其中97%(31例中的30例)的IgA或IgG抗PC抗体水平高于健康对照组。两组之间IgM抗PC抗体亚型无鉴别意义。其他感染患者的7份血清(19%)IgG抗PC值高于健康组;其中3份VDRL试验呈阳性。布鲁氏菌病组和健康组中IgG和IgA抗PC(血清稀释1:1600)的ELISA平均数值分别为:IgG,0.80±0.17对0.23±0.10;IgA,0.86±0.26对0.35±0.15。ELISA-PC检测的敏感性和特异性分别为:IgG,96.8%和96.5%;IgA,90.3%和89.7%。14例临床治愈的布鲁氏菌病患者中只有1例有显著的IgG抗PC抗体。相比之下,所有这些患者的布鲁氏菌病传统检测均呈阳性。ELISA-PC检测的血清IgA、IgG抗PC水平与MAT或库姆斯试验结果之间未发现相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验