• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[新型水凝胶敷料治疗血管性溃疡的非对照评估]

[Non-comparative evaluation of a new hydrofiber dressing in the treatment of vascular ulcers].

作者信息

Legarra Muruzaba S, Vidallach Ribes M S, Esteban Gonzalo M

机构信息

Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona.

出版信息

Rev Enferm. 1997 Nov;20(231):59-63.

PMID:9451237
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the hydrofiber dressing in the treatment of leg ulcers.

METHODS

Multicenter, open, non-comparative study of 23 patients with the mean age of 69.6 years. The mean duration of actual ulcer was 2.6 years.

RESULTS

Twelve (55%) patients had marketed improvement in overall change in the condition on the wound and 5 (23%) patients had mild improvement. The majority of dressing changes were pain-free (63%). The dressing changes, application and removal, were easy 171 (99%) and 149 (87%). The mean dressing wear time was 2.4 days. The mean ulcer area at the start of the study was 2.730 mm2 and the final dressing change was 1.963 mm2. The median percentage reduction was 36%.

CONCLUSION

The use of the non-occlusive hydrofiber dressing is suitable for the treatment of exudating leg ulcers.

摘要

目的

评估水凝胶敷料治疗腿部溃疡的效果。

方法

对23例平均年龄69.6岁的患者进行多中心、开放性、非对照研究。实际溃疡的平均持续时间为2.6年。

结果

12例(55%)患者伤口状况总体改善明显,5例(23%)患者有轻度改善。大多数换药过程无痛(63%)。换药、敷料应用和去除操作简便的分别为171例(99%)和149例(87%)。敷料平均使用时间为2.4天。研究开始时溃疡平均面积为2.730平方毫米,最后一次换药时为1.963平方毫米。中位数减少百分比为36%。

结论

使用非封闭性水凝胶敷料适用于治疗有渗液的腿部溃疡。

相似文献

1
[Non-comparative evaluation of a new hydrofiber dressing in the treatment of vascular ulcers].[新型水凝胶敷料治疗血管性溃疡的非对照评估]
Rev Enferm. 1997 Nov;20(231):59-63.
2
A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.一项关于透明吸水性丙烯酸敷料和水胶体敷料用于治疗II期和浅III期压疮的前瞻性、随机、多中心临床评估。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Apr;21(4):169-74. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305429.01413.f8.
3
Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.水胶体封闭敷料治疗腿部溃疡
Arch Dermatol. 1984 Oct;120(10):1329-36.
4
[Pure calcium-sodium alginate dressing. Multicenter evaluation of chronic cutaneous lesions].[纯钙-海藻酸钠敷料。慢性皮肤损伤的多中心评估]
Rev Enferm. 1997 Sep;20(229):23-30.
5
Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers.含离子银水凝胶敷料或海藻酸钙敷料用于非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Diabet Med. 2007 Mar;24(3):280-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02079.x.
6
Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.在下肢静脉性溃疡治疗中比较泡沫复合材料与水凝胶泡沫敷料:一项对照临床研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Nov;50(11):42-55.
7
[Case report about the combined use of 2 moist wound dressings in the treatment of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer].[关于两种湿性伤口敷料联合用于治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡的病例报告]
Rev Enferm. 1998 Oct;21(242):suppl 9-12.
8
A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.一项评估泡沫敷料在慢性伤口处理中临床性能的前瞻性开放标签研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 May;52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim.
9
A comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers.蜂蜜与聚维酮碘作为瓦格纳II型糖尿病足溃疡换药溶液的对比研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2008 Mar;63(1):44-6.
10
[A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers].水凝胶敷料Allevyn与水胶体敷料Duoderm在腿部溃疡局部治疗中的对比研究
Phlebologie. 1992 Nov-Dec;45(4):529-33.

引用本文的文献

1
A dressing history.一份换药史。
Int Wound J. 2004 Apr;1(1):59-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.0009.x.