Kohan R, Frajewicki V, Ben-Ari J, Shostak A, Golan N, Gotloib L
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
J Lab Clin Med. 1998 Jan;131(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2143(98)90079-8.
Conventional glucose-based solutions for peritoneal dialysis fluids have been shown to raise problems of biocompatibility. We therefore evaluated the ultrafiltration capabilities of raffinose as an alternative osmotic agent in a non-uremic rat model. Animals were divided into four groups and injected intraperitoneally with solutions containing raffinose (4.5%, 345 mOsm/kg; 16.7%, 518 mOsm/kg) or glucose (1.5%, 346 mOsm/kg; 4.25%, 489 mOsm/kg). Data obtained from animals exposed to 16.7% raffinose were excluded because of precipitation of the osmotic agent. Low-osmolality raffinose solution induced higher ultrafiltered volume than the low-osmolality glucose-enriched fluid at 120 minutes of dwelling time. No significant differences were observed in effluent sodium and potassium concentration and protein dialysate-to-plasma (D/P) ratio. The D/P ratio of phosphate was higher in the low-osmolality raffinose-based fluid than in the low-osmolality glucose solution. The osmolality of the solutions was significantly decreased after a dwelling time of 120 minutes. We conclude that 4.5% raffinose is an effective osmotic agent. Total or partial replacement of glucose by raffinose for clinical peritoneal dialysis could be eventually considered after appropriate evaluation of its biocompatibility and general side effects.
传统的基于葡萄糖的腹膜透析液已被证明会引发生物相容性问题。因此,我们在非尿毒症大鼠模型中评估了棉子糖作为替代渗透剂的超滤能力。将动物分为四组,腹腔注射含棉子糖(4.5%,345 mOsm/kg;16.7%,518 mOsm/kg)或葡萄糖(1.5%,346 mOsm/kg;4.25%,489 mOsm/kg)的溶液。由于渗透剂沉淀,排除了暴露于16.7%棉子糖的动物所获得的数据。在驻留时间120分钟时,低渗棉子糖溶液诱导的超滤体积高于低渗富葡萄糖液。流出液钠和钾浓度以及蛋白质透析液与血浆(D/P)比值未观察到显著差异。低渗棉子糖基液中磷酸盐的D/P比值高于低渗葡萄糖溶液。在驻留120分钟后,溶液的渗透压显著降低。我们得出结论,4.5%棉子糖是一种有效的渗透剂。在对其生物相容性和一般副作用进行适当评估后,最终可考虑用棉子糖完全或部分替代葡萄糖用于临床腹膜透析。