• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏导管插入术经股动脉入路后使用胶原蛋白的止血成功率及局部并发症:对6007例已发表病例的分析

Hemostasis success rates and local complications with collagen after femoral access for cardiac catheterization: analysis of 6007 published patients.

作者信息

Silber S

机构信息

Dr. Müller Hospital, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1998 Jan;135(1):152-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70356-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70356-4
PMID:9453535
Abstract

Since the first clinical studies regarding sealing of arterial puncture sites with collagen with the use of the vascular hemostatic device (VHD) and the hemostatic puncture closing device (HPCD) in the early 1990s were performed, no analysis summarizing the published patients has been reported. Therefore we performed a Medline search of data as far back as 1990 and included abstracts presented at the major scientific meetings in the United States (American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology), Europe (European Society of Cardiology), and Germany (German Society of Cardiology). A total of 6007 patients were found to have been enrolled in studies with VHD (4448 patients) or with HPCD (1559 patients). Parameters analyzed in this review were hemostasis success rates and local complications. To assess the impact of the sealing devices on local complications, studies without control groups were excluded. The hemostasis success rates immediately after deployment seemed to be higher for HPCD, but at 2' to 5' after sheath removal, they were in the same range for VHD and HPCD. In controlled studies minor local complications occurred at a rate of 7.6% in the VHD group and in 6.7% of the HPCD group. Because the control group in the HPCD studies showed a considerably higher rate of minor complications than the VHD group (11.7% vs 5.7%), the reduction in minor complications was statistically significant for HPCD, whereas VHD did not reduce minor local complications. Major local complications were reported in 3.8% of the VHD group but in only 1.8% of the HPCD group. The increase of major local complications was statistically significant with VHD (control, 1.7%) but not with HPCD (control, 1.4%). Our analysis shows that some differences between collagen devices may exist, but neither device has been proven to reduce major local complications.

摘要

自20世纪90年代初首次开展关于使用血管止血装置(VHD)和止血穿刺闭合装置(HPCD)用胶原蛋白封闭动脉穿刺部位的临床研究以来,尚未有对已发表患者数据进行总结分析的报道。因此,我们对1990年以来的数据进行了医学文献数据库(Medline)检索,并纳入了在美国(美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会)、欧洲(欧洲心脏病学会)和德国(德国心脏病学会)主要科学会议上发表的摘要。共发现6007例患者参与了VHD(4448例患者)或HPCD(1559例患者)相关研究。本综述分析的参数为止血成功率和局部并发症。为评估封闭装置对局部并发症的影响,排除了无对照组的研究。HPCD在装置植入后立即的止血成功率似乎更高,但在拔除鞘管后2至5分钟,VHD和HPCD的止血成功率处于同一范围。在对照研究中,VHD组轻微局部并发症发生率为7.6%,HPCD组为6.7%。由于HPCD研究中的对照组轻微并发症发生率显著高于VHD组(11.7%对5.7%),HPCD组轻微并发症的减少具有统计学意义,而VHD并未降低轻微局部并发症的发生率。VHD组严重局部并发症报告率为3.8%,而HPCD组仅为1.8%。VHD组严重局部并发症的增加具有统计学意义(对照组为1.7%),而HPCD组则无统计学意义(对照组为1.4%)。我们的分析表明,胶原蛋白封闭装置之间可能存在一些差异,但两种装置均未被证实可减少严重局部并发症。

相似文献

1
Hemostasis success rates and local complications with collagen after femoral access for cardiac catheterization: analysis of 6007 published patients.心脏导管插入术经股动脉入路后使用胶原蛋白的止血成功率及局部并发症:对6007例已发表病例的分析
Am Heart J. 1998 Jan;135(1):152-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70356-4.
2
Rapid hemostasis of arterial puncture sites with collagen in patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization.在接受诊断性和介入性心导管插入术的患者中使用胶原蛋白实现动脉穿刺部位的快速止血。
Clin Cardiol. 1997 Dec;20(12):981-92. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960201203.
3
Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients.在1317例连续接受心脏导管插入术的患者中,心脏导管插入术后立即系统使用基于胶原蛋白的血管闭合装置。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Dec;57(4):486-95. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10254.
4
A new hemostatic puncture closure device for the immediate sealing of arterial puncture sites.一种用于即时封闭动脉穿刺部位的新型止血穿刺闭合装置。
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Aug 15;72(5):445-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91138-8.
5
Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.一种新型血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性:ExoSeal与Angio-Seal和ProGlide的前瞻性对比研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Dec;21(6):822-8. doi: 10.1583/14-4744MR.1.
6
Risk of local adverse events by gender following cardiac catheterization.心脏导管插入术后按性别划分的局部不良事件风险。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Feb;16(2):125-31. doi: 10.1002/pds.1307.
7
[Complications with femoral access in cardiac cathetization. Impact of previous systematic femoral angiography and hemostasis with VasoSeal-ES collagen plug].
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003 Jun;56(6):569-77. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(03)76918-8.
8
Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.基于夹子与缝线介导的血管闭合用于股动脉穿刺止血的安全性和有效性:一项比较StarClose和ProGlide装置的前瞻性随机单中心研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):402-407. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27116. Epub 2017 May 13.
9
Sheath pulling immediately after PTCA: comparison of two different deployment techniques for the hemostatic puncture closure device: a prospective, randomized study.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997 Aug;41(4):378-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199708)41:4<378::aid-ccd5>3.0.co;2-2.
10
Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后手动压迫与血管止血装置的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Access site pseudoaneurysms after endovascular intervention for peripheral arterial diseases.外周动脉疾病血管内介入治疗后穿刺部位假性动脉瘤
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Jun;96(6):305-312. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.96.6.305. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Long Term Outcome after Application of the Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Device in Minipigs.小型猪应用血管封堵器后的长期预后
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0163878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163878. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparison of Angioseal and Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Interventional Procedures.
经股动脉冠状动脉及外周血管介入手术患者中Angioseal封堵与手动压迫的比较。
Int J Angiol. 2015 Jun;24(2):133-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547449.
4
Initial experience with Angioseal™: Safety and efficacy of the endovascular closure device.Angioseal™初始经验:血管内闭合装置的安全性和有效性。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013 Apr;23(2):134-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.116566.
5
Randomized comparison of effects of suture-based and collagen-based vascular closure devices on post-procedural leg perfusion.基于缝线和基于胶原蛋白的血管闭合装置对术后腿部灌注影响的随机对照比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 Jan;97(1):43-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0575-z. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
6
Implantation of the Corinthian IQ stent into the femoropopliteal arteries using 6-F introducer sheaths in antegrade and crossover procedures: midterm results.在顺行和交叉手术中使用6F穿刺鞘将科林斯IQ支架植入股腘动脉:中期结果
Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2535-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1900-1. Epub 2003 Apr 23.
7
Final report of the European multi-center registry using the Duett vascular sealing device.使用Duett血管封闭装置的欧洲多中心注册研究最终报告。
Herz. 1999 Dec;24(8):620-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03044486.
8
The Duett closure device: concept and experimental results.杜埃特闭合装置:概念与实验结果。
Herz. 1999 Dec;24(8):614-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03044485.
9
[Hemostatic closure of arterial puncture site using Angio-Seal after diagnostic heart catheterization or coronary intervention].
Herz. 1999 Dec;24(8):607-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03044484.