Suppr超能文献

心脏导管插入术经股动脉入路后使用胶原蛋白的止血成功率及局部并发症:对6007例已发表病例的分析

Hemostasis success rates and local complications with collagen after femoral access for cardiac catheterization: analysis of 6007 published patients.

作者信息

Silber S

机构信息

Dr. Müller Hospital, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1998 Jan;135(1):152-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70356-4.

Abstract

Since the first clinical studies regarding sealing of arterial puncture sites with collagen with the use of the vascular hemostatic device (VHD) and the hemostatic puncture closing device (HPCD) in the early 1990s were performed, no analysis summarizing the published patients has been reported. Therefore we performed a Medline search of data as far back as 1990 and included abstracts presented at the major scientific meetings in the United States (American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology), Europe (European Society of Cardiology), and Germany (German Society of Cardiology). A total of 6007 patients were found to have been enrolled in studies with VHD (4448 patients) or with HPCD (1559 patients). Parameters analyzed in this review were hemostasis success rates and local complications. To assess the impact of the sealing devices on local complications, studies without control groups were excluded. The hemostasis success rates immediately after deployment seemed to be higher for HPCD, but at 2' to 5' after sheath removal, they were in the same range for VHD and HPCD. In controlled studies minor local complications occurred at a rate of 7.6% in the VHD group and in 6.7% of the HPCD group. Because the control group in the HPCD studies showed a considerably higher rate of minor complications than the VHD group (11.7% vs 5.7%), the reduction in minor complications was statistically significant for HPCD, whereas VHD did not reduce minor local complications. Major local complications were reported in 3.8% of the VHD group but in only 1.8% of the HPCD group. The increase of major local complications was statistically significant with VHD (control, 1.7%) but not with HPCD (control, 1.4%). Our analysis shows that some differences between collagen devices may exist, but neither device has been proven to reduce major local complications.

摘要

自20世纪90年代初首次开展关于使用血管止血装置(VHD)和止血穿刺闭合装置(HPCD)用胶原蛋白封闭动脉穿刺部位的临床研究以来,尚未有对已发表患者数据进行总结分析的报道。因此,我们对1990年以来的数据进行了医学文献数据库(Medline)检索,并纳入了在美国(美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会)、欧洲(欧洲心脏病学会)和德国(德国心脏病学会)主要科学会议上发表的摘要。共发现6007例患者参与了VHD(4448例患者)或HPCD(1559例患者)相关研究。本综述分析的参数为止血成功率和局部并发症。为评估封闭装置对局部并发症的影响,排除了无对照组的研究。HPCD在装置植入后立即的止血成功率似乎更高,但在拔除鞘管后2至5分钟,VHD和HPCD的止血成功率处于同一范围。在对照研究中,VHD组轻微局部并发症发生率为7.6%,HPCD组为6.7%。由于HPCD研究中的对照组轻微并发症发生率显著高于VHD组(11.7%对5.7%),HPCD组轻微并发症的减少具有统计学意义,而VHD并未降低轻微局部并发症的发生率。VHD组严重局部并发症报告率为3.8%,而HPCD组仅为1.8%。VHD组严重局部并发症的增加具有统计学意义(对照组为1.7%),而HPCD组则无统计学意义(对照组为1.4%)。我们的分析表明,胶原蛋白封闭装置之间可能存在一些差异,但两种装置均未被证实可减少严重局部并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验