Bale S, Squires D, Varnon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding K G
Wound Healing Research Unit, Cardiff, UK.
J Wound Care. 1997 Nov;6(10):463-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1997.6.10.463.
This study compared a polyurethane foam dressing with a hydrocolloid dressing for ease of application and removal, adhesion, conformability, absorbency and wear time. A randomised study was carried out, including 61 patients with stage two or three pressure sores in five centres in the UK. Dressings were applied for up to 30 days and assessments were carried out at each dressing change. The results indicated that both dressings are easy and convenient to apply; absorbency and ease of removal were significantly better with the polyurethane foam dressing than the hydrocolloid dressing; wear times were similar.
本研究比较了聚氨酯泡沫敷料和水胶体敷料在应用和去除的便利性、粘性、贴合性、吸收性及佩戴时间方面的差异。开展了一项随机研究，纳入了英国五个中心的61例患有二期或三期压疮的患者。敷料应用长达30天，每次更换敷料时进行评估。结果表明，两种敷料应用起来都简便易行；聚氨酯泡沫敷料在吸收性和去除便利性方面明显优于水胶体敷料；佩戴时间相似。
