Suppr超能文献

两种敷料在压疮管理中的比较。

A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management.

作者信息

Bale S, Squires D, Varnon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding K G

机构信息

Wound Healing Research Unit, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 1997 Nov;6(10):463-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1997.6.10.463.

Abstract

This study compared a polyurethane foam dressing with a hydrocolloid dressing for ease of application and removal, adhesion, conformability, absorbency and wear time. A randomised study was carried out, including 61 patients with stage two or three pressure sores in five centres in the UK. Dressings were applied for up to 30 days and assessments were carried out at each dressing change. The results indicated that both dressings are easy and convenient to apply; absorbency and ease of removal were significantly better with the polyurethane foam dressing than the hydrocolloid dressing; wear times were similar.

摘要

本研究比较了聚氨酯泡沫敷料和水胶体敷料在应用和去除的便利性、粘性、贴合性、吸收性及佩戴时间方面的差异。开展了一项随机研究,纳入了英国五个中心的61例患有二期或三期压疮的患者。敷料应用长达30天,每次更换敷料时进行评估。结果表明,两种敷料应用起来都简便易行;聚氨酯泡沫敷料在吸收性和去除便利性方面明显优于水胶体敷料;佩戴时间相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验