Phipatanakul W P, Johnson S A, Good V, Clarke I C
Howard and Irene Peterson Tribology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92354, USA.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Feb;39(2):229-33. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199802)39:2<229::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-r.
Controversy surrounds wear data from hip-simulator studies, whether from the choice of lubricants or other parameters such as the particular biomaterial combinations used, and whether any such interactions could bias the resulting wear predictions. To investigate these phenomena, we studied the wear performance of CoCr and alumina femoral heads, in water and serum-based lubricants, using as our standard the polytetrafluoroethylene wear data derived clinically by Charnley. To model Charnley's clinical experience, PTFE acetabular cups were used in sets of three each with each size of femoral head for 22.25, 28, and 42-mm diameters in a nine-channel hip simulator. From the serum-based tests, the CoCr-PTFE wear data were consistently linear with duration of test, exhibited very large wear rates of 3,000-8,400 mm3/10(6), cycles had a precision within +/- 4% for each set of three cups, and copious amounts of small particulate were clearly seen circulating. The wear data clearly demonstrated Charnley's thesis that volume of wear increased with regard to size of femoral head. From the water-based tests, the CoCr-PTFE wear data were nonlinear with duration of test, had much reduced wear rates compared to the serum tests, lost the clinical relationship with ball size, and precision deteriorated to +/- 27% for each set. The wear debris appeared as 1-2 cm long ribbons which floated to the surface. For the alumina-PTFE combination in serum, the wear data appeared identical in performance to the CoCr-PTFE data in serum. Thus, the PTFE wear rates were not sensitive to the choice of femoral-head material. The most surprising outcome in this study was the zero-wear performance of the ceramic-PTFE combination in water. This contrasted remarkably with the large wear rates established for the same combinations run in serum. The zero-wear performance of the ceramic-PTFE combination in water was unexpected, but a similar phenomenon was noted in published simulator tests of ceramic-UHMWPE run in water. It now seems likely that such data may reflect the capricious behavior of water lubrication rather than any other variables under evaluation. The water-based experiments clearly favored the ceramic's superior tribological performance and placed metal bearings at a decided disadvantage. Therefore, for an in vitro simulation of materials wear-ranking of clinical relevance, it may be advisable to use a serum-based lubricant.
髋关节模拟器研究中的磨损数据存在争议,争议点在于润滑剂的选择或其他参数,如所使用的特定生物材料组合,以及任何此类相互作用是否会使所得的磨损预测产生偏差。为了研究这些现象,我们以Charnley临床获得的聚四氟乙烯磨损数据为标准,研究了钴铬合金和氧化铝股骨头在水基和血清基润滑剂中的磨损性能。为了模拟Charnley的临床经验,在九通道髋关节模拟器中,使用了聚四氟乙烯髋臼杯,每种尺寸的股骨头各三个,股骨头直径分别为22.25、28和42毫米。在血清基测试中,钴铬合金 - 聚四氟乙烯的磨损数据与测试持续时间始终呈线性关系,磨损率非常高,为3000 - 8400立方毫米/10^6次循环,每组三个杯子的精度在±4%以内,并且可以清楚地看到大量小颗粒在循环。磨损数据清楚地证明了Charnley的论点,即磨损量随股骨头尺寸增加。在水基测试中,钴铬合金 - 聚四氟乙烯的磨损数据与测试持续时间呈非线性关系,与血清测试相比磨损率大幅降低,失去了与球头尺寸的临床关系,每组的精度降至±27%。磨损碎屑呈现为1 - 2厘米长的带状物,漂浮到表面。对于血清中的氧化铝 - 聚四氟乙烯组合,其磨损数据在性能上与血清中的钴铬合金 - 聚四氟乙烯数据相同。因此,聚四氟乙烯的磨损率对股骨头材料的选择不敏感。本研究中最令人惊讶的结果是陶瓷 - 聚四氟乙烯组合在水中的零磨损性能。这与在血清中运行的相同组合所确定的高磨损率形成了显著对比。陶瓷 - 聚四氟乙烯组合在水中的零磨损性能出乎意料,但在已发表的陶瓷 - 超高分子量聚乙烯在水中运行的模拟器测试中也注意到了类似现象。现在看来,此类数据可能反映了水润滑的多变行为,而非正在评估的任何其他变量。水基实验明显有利于陶瓷优越的摩擦学性能,使金属轴承处于明显劣势。因此,对于具有临床相关性的材料磨损排名的体外模拟,使用血清基润滑剂可能是明智的。