• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于应激情境应对量表(CISS)的评分者间一致性。

Interrater agreement on the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS).

作者信息

Kurokawa N K, Weed N C

机构信息

University of Mississippi.

出版信息

Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):93-100. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500111.

DOI:10.1177/107319119800500111
PMID:9458345
Abstract

The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a 48-item self-report inventory designed to measure three basic coping styles: Task Oriented, Emotion Oriented, and Avoidance Oriented coping. The psychometric properties of this inventory are promising, but CISS scores have not yet been shown to reflect behavioral variation in response to stress. This study was designed as a first step toward this end by examining the relationship between self- and peer-report on the CISS. One hundred and sixty-three pairs of friends completed the CISS, a peer form of the CISS, and a friendship questionnaire. Positive but modest correlations were found for each construct. Higher correlations were obtained when comparing scores across forms completed by the same informant, indicating that examinees believe their friends cope as they do themselves. Actual friend similarity was apparent only on Avoidance Oriented coping. Neither depth of relationship nor item observability moderated peer-self agreement.

摘要

压力情境应对量表(CISS)是一个包含48个条目的自陈式量表,旨在测量三种基本应对方式:任务导向型、情绪导向型和回避导向型应对。该量表的心理测量特性良好,但CISS得分尚未被证明能反映对应激的行为差异。本研究旨在通过考察CISS的自评与同伴评之间的关系,朝着这一目标迈出第一步。163对朋友完成了CISS、CISS的同伴版以及一份友谊问卷。各结构之间存在正向但适度的相关性。当比较同一受访者完成的不同版本的得分时,相关性更高,这表明受访者认为他们的朋友应对方式与自己相同。实际的朋友相似性仅在回避导向型应对上明显。关系深度和项目可观察性均未调节同伴与自我的一致性。

相似文献

1
Interrater agreement on the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS).关于应激情境应对量表(CISS)的评分者间一致性。
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):93-100. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500111.
2
Use of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations in a clinically depressed sample: factor structure, personality correlates, and prediction of distress.在临床抑郁症样本中使用应激情境应对量表:因素结构、人格相关性及痛苦预测
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;59(4):423-37. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10080.
3
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): a contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping].压力情境应对量表(CISS)日文版的信效度:对应对方式跨文化研究的贡献
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1993;95(8):602-20.
4
Psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in patients with acquired brain injury.应对紧张情境量表(CISS)在后天性脑损伤患者中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):848-856. doi: 10.1037/a0036275. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
5
VALIDATION OF THE ITALIAN VERSION OF THE COPING INVENTORY FOR STRESSFUL SITUATIONS-SHORT VERSION AMONG HOSPITAL-BASED NURSES.医院护士群体中应激情境应对量表意大利语简版的效度验证
Psychol Rep. 2015 Oct;117(2):457-72. doi: 10.2466/08.03.PR0.117c22z1. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Stress coping strategies in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and how they relate to trauma symptoms, alexithymia, anger and mood.心因性非癲癇性發作患者的應對壓力策略,以及這些策略如何與創傷症狀、情緒表達困難、怒氣和情緒相關。
Seizure. 2013 Oct;22(8):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 18.
7
Measuring coping style following acquired brain injury: a modification of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations Using Rasch analysis.测量获得性脑损伤后的应对方式:使用拉施分析对压力情境应对量表的修订。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2015 Sep;54(3):249-65. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12070. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
Is the effect of coping styles disease specific? Relationships with emotional distress and quality of life in acquired brain injury and multiple sclerosis.应对方式的效果是否具有疾病特异性?在获得性脑损伤和多发性硬化症中与情绪困扰和生活质量的关系。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Jan;32(1):116-126. doi: 10.1177/0269215517718367. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Relationship between stress coping and personality in patients with major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者应激应对与人格之间的关系。
Psychother Psychosom. 1999;68(1):26-30. doi: 10.1159/000012307.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for adults for stressful situations in healthy people.成人应对量表日文版在健康人群应激情况下的信度与效度
Psychol Rep. 2015 Apr;116(2):447-69. doi: 10.2466/08.02.PR0.116k23w6. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Effects and Quality of Life in Parents and Children with Jia-Associated Uveitis.幼年型关节炎相关葡萄膜炎患儿及其父母的心理影响和生活质量
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;9(12):1864. doi: 10.3390/children9121864.
2
Complementary and alternative medicine: use and disclosure in radiation oncology community practice.补充和替代医学:在放射肿瘤学社区实践中的使用和披露。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0846-5. Epub 2010 Mar 25.