Bach D S, Cohen J L, Fioretti P M, Ginzton L E, Sklar J, Zabalgoitia M, Crouse L
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jan 1;81(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00800-x.
Closed-loop arbutamine stress echocardiography has been shown to be safe and effective for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) using a standardized infusion protocol and centralized core laboratory analyses. However, the accuracy of arbutamine stress echocardiography using local test interpretation has not been previously tested in a large population. The present study reports the safety, sensitivity, and specificity of arbutamine stress echocardiography in a multicenter trial allowing user-defined, nonstandardized protocols and local test interpretation. In all, 1,070 patients underwent arbutamine stress testing at 81 sites. Heart rate increased from 73 +/- 13 to 124 +/- 15 beats/min, systolic blood pressure from 144 +/- 24 to 174 +/- 25 mm Hg, and pressure rate product x 10(3) from 10.5 +/- 2.8 to 19.6 +/- 3.9. Among 1,070 patients, there were only 2 (0.2%) significant adverse events related to arbutamine, both of which resolved completely with appropriate therapy. There were no incidents of ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or death related to testing. Among 242 patients who underwent arbutamine stress echocardiography and diagnostic coronary angiography within 12 weeks, sensitivity and specificity for detection of CAD were 71% (95% confidence interval 64% to 77%) and 67% (95% confidence interval 52% to 80%), respectively. Closed-loop arbutamine stress echocardiography is a safe and effective method for evaluating CAD in clinical practice.
