Croce P, Signorelli P, Dedè A, Galli D
Divisione di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Civico Ospedale Codogno, Milano.
Minerva Ginecol. 1997 Oct;49(10):449-53.
The study aimed to highlight any differences between the sequelae of episiorrhaphy performed using the Blair-Donatti and Guilmen-Pontonnier techniques.
A total of 202 pregnant women were recruited in the Obstetrics Ward of Codogno Civic Hospital in 1994 and 1995. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups matched for socioeconomic status, age and parity (group A: Guilmen-Pontonnier suture, group B: Blair-Donatti suture). The following parameters were evaluated: pain twenty-four hours, sixty-six hours and one, two and three months after labour, pain during sexual relations, the onset of infection, hematoma, dehiscence of the wound, and lastly the cosmetic results.
No significant differences were found between the parameters examined in both groups, barring the improved cosmetic result in group A.
本研究旨在突出使用布莱尔 - 多纳蒂技术和吉尔曼 - 庞托尼尔技术进行会阴缝合后的后遗症之间的差异。
1994年和1995年，在科多尼奥市立医院产科病房招募了202名孕妇。受试者被随机分为两组，根据社会经济地位、年龄和产次进行匹配（A组：吉尔曼 - 庞托尼尔缝合，B组：布莱尔 - 多纳蒂缝合）。评估以下参数：分娩后24小时、66小时、1个月、2个月和3个月时的疼痛、性交时的疼痛、感染的发生、血肿、伤口裂开，最后是美容效果。
两组检查的参数之间未发现显著差异，除了A组的美容效果有所改善。
