• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对比剂增强磁共振血管造影术用于确定冠状动脉搭桥的通畅性。与冠状动脉造影的比较]

[Contrast media enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for determining patency of a coronary bypass. A comparison with coronary angiography].

作者信息

Wintersperger B J, von Smekal A, Engelmann M G, Knez A, Penzkofer H V, Laub G, Reiser M

机构信息

Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

出版信息

Rofo. 1997 Dec;167(6):572-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015585.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1015585
PMID:9465951
Abstract

AIM

Assessment of graft patency with current non-invasive MRA techniques is particularly difficult for evaluating internal mammary artery grafts. Our aim is to determine the accuracy of a contrast enhanced MRA technique is assessing graft patency.

METHODS

We examined 19 patients with a total of 53 grafts (32 venous/21 arterial), using an ultrafast contrast enhanced 3D gradient-echo technique and compared this with the results of selective angiography.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of the contrast enhanced method was 95.2% for venous grafts, 94.4% for IMA grafts and 94.8% overall. Specificity was 85.7% overall, 90.9% for venous and 66.7% for IMA grafts. Positive predictive value was 94.4%.

CONCLUSION

Compared with previous studies, visualisation of IMA grafts was improved by using contrast enhanced MRA. In this preliminary study, contrast enhanced MRA proved promising for the assessment of graft patency.

摘要

目的

利用当前的非侵入性磁共振血管造影(MRA)技术评估移植血管通畅情况对于评估内乳动脉移植血管尤为困难。我们的目的是确定一种对比增强MRA技术在评估移植血管通畅情况方面的准确性。

方法

我们使用超快对比增强三维梯度回波技术检查了19例患者,共53条移植血管(32条静脉/21条动脉),并将其与选择性血管造影结果进行比较。

结果

对比增强法对静脉移植血管的敏感性为95.2%,对内乳动脉移植血管的敏感性为94.4%,总体敏感性为94.8%。总体特异性为85.7%,静脉移植血管为90.9%,内乳动脉移植血管为66.7%。阳性预测值为94.4%。

结论

与先前的研究相比,使用对比增强MRA改善了内乳动脉移植血管的可视化。在这项初步研究中,对比增强MRA在评估移植血管通畅情况方面被证明很有前景。

相似文献

1
[Contrast media enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for determining patency of a coronary bypass. A comparison with coronary angiography].[对比剂增强磁共振血管造影术用于确定冠状动脉搭桥的通畅性。与冠状动脉造影的比较]
Rofo. 1997 Dec;167(6):572-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015585.
2
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for control of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass conduits (MIDCAB/OPCAB).用于微创冠状动脉搭桥血管(微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术/非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术)控制的对比增强磁共振血管造影术。
Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(3):222-5.
3
[2D-phase contrast flow evaluation and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for perioperative assessment of internal mammary artery grafts].[二维相位对比血流评估和对比增强磁共振血管造影在乳内动脉移植围手术期评估中的应用]
Rofo. 2001 Sep;173(9):790-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16976.
4
[A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency].[用于检测冠状动脉搭桥通畅性的超快计算机断层扫描、磁共振血管造影和选择性血管造影的比较]
Rofo. 1997 Mar;166(3):185-91.
5
[Control of the patency of coronary artery bypasses with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography].[应用对比增强磁共振血管造影术控制冠状动脉旁路移植血管通畅性]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998;115:1308-11.
6
Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography--value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique.
Radiology. 1998 Aug;208(2):345-51. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680557.
7
Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.通过对比增强磁共振血管造影术检测冠状动脉搭桥移植血管通畅情况
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Apr;15(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00049-4.
8
Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.通过磁共振成像评估左胸廓内动脉微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):607-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.064.
9
Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.冠状动脉搭桥移植血管通畅性:采用稳态进动真稳态自由进动序列磁共振成像与钆增强磁共振血管造影进行评估。
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):440-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272011953. Epub 2003 Apr 3.
10
Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts: value of different breath-hold MR imaging techniques.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 May;172(5):1359-64. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227517.

引用本文的文献

1
Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries.心血管磁共振在冠状动脉评估中的作用
World J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 26;6(10):1060-6. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i10.1060.
2
Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?磁共振冠状动脉成像:我们今天在哪里?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Feb;15(2):328. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0328-0.
3
Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography.
冠状动脉搭桥移植术的非侵入性磁共振成像。快速自旋回波序列和导航技术与传统冠状动脉造影的比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Dec;18(6):469-77; discussion 483-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1021149420323.