Monagle J, Barnes R, Goodchild C, Hewitt M
Department of Anaesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997 Nov;14(6):604-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1994.00184.x.
Peri-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), remain a considerable problem. Ondansetron is being promoted currently as the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of PONV. Experiments to investigate efficacy of ondansetron in PONV have been made with placebo or single doses of other drugs, e.g. metoclopramide, and often with different anaesthetic regimes with different emetic potential. This study investigated the relative benefits, in the prevention of PONV, of ondansetron compared with metoclopramide used at a dose higher than used in previous studies. Ninety-six patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery were randomized to receive either ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 0.4 mg kg-1. The patients were then assessed in the recovery room, in the day ward prior to discharge and the following day for the occurrence of PONV. Emetic symptoms occurred in similar proportions of patients who received ondansetron and metoclopramide. Nausea scores were similar between the groups in the recovery ward and 24-h follow-ups but there were higher post-operative nausea scores in the ondansetron group in the day ward (P = 0.001). There were no significant side effects due to either drug. We conclude that moderate dose metoclopramide is an effective alternative to ondansetron in the control of PONV.
围手术期恶心呕吐(PONV)仍然是一个相当严重的问题。目前,昂丹司琼被推崇为预防和治疗PONV的首选药物。已开展了一些实验,以安慰剂或单剂量的其他药物(如甲氧氯普胺)作为对照,研究昂丹司琼对PONV的疗效,而且这些实验常常采用具有不同催吐可能性的不同麻醉方案。本研究比较了昂丹司琼与甲氧氯普胺(使用高于以往研究的剂量)在预防PONV方面的相对益处。96例行小型妇科手术的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受4 mg昂丹司琼或0.4 mg·kg-1甲氧氯普胺治疗。随后,对患者在恢复室、出院前日间病房及术后次日的PONV发生情况进行评估。接受昂丹司琼和甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者出现呕吐症状的比例相似。在恢复病房及24小时随访时,两组的恶心评分相似,但在日间病房,昂丹司琼组术后恶心评分更高(P = 0.001)。两种药物均未引起明显的副作用。我们得出结论,中等剂量的甲氧氯普胺在控制PONV方面是昂丹司琼的有效替代药物。