Krobbuaban Banjong, Pitakpol Samrong, Diregpoke Siriwan
Division of Anesthesiology, Chaiyaphum Hospital, Chaiyaphum, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):669-74.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a very troublesome concomitant phenomenon after general anesthesia. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron with metoclopramide for prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing major gynecological surgery.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, 382 female patients received either ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg intravenous administration immediately before the induction of anesthesia. A standard general anesthetic technique was employed throughout. Nausea, vomiting, and safety assessments were performed continuously during the 24 h postoperative period.
Of the 380 patients evaluated, significantly fewer ondansetron 4 mg treated patients (89/189; 47%) experienced postoperative nausea and/or vomiting compared with metoclopramide treated patients (115/ 191; 60%) during the study period (p = 0.007, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.66). Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between the groups.
Prophylactic use of ondansetron is more effective than metoclopramide for preventing PONV in patients undergoing major gynecological surgery.
术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍是全身麻醉后一个非常棘手的伴随现象。本研究旨在比较昂丹司琼与甲氧氯普胺在预防妇科大手术患者PONV方面的疗效和安全性。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,382例女性患者在麻醉诱导前即刻分别接受4mg昂丹司琼或10mg甲氧氯普胺静脉注射。全程采用标准的全身麻醉技术。术后24小时内持续进行恶心、呕吐及安全性评估。
在380例评估患者中,研究期间,与甲氧氯普胺治疗组(115/191;60%)相比,4mg昂丹司琼治疗组术后出现恶心和/或呕吐的患者明显更少(89/189;47%)(p = 0.007,95%CI:1.07,1.66)。两组术后不良事件无显著差异。
在预防妇科大手术患者的PONV方面,预防性使用昂丹司琼比甲氧氯普胺更有效。