Suppr超能文献

昂丹司琼与胃复安预防妇科手术后恶心呕吐的比较

Ondansetron vs. metoclopramide for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery.

作者信息

Krobbuaban Banjong, Pitakpol Samrong, Diregpoke Siriwan

机构信息

Division of Anesthesiology, Chaiyaphum Hospital, Chaiyaphum, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):669-74.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a very troublesome concomitant phenomenon after general anesthesia. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ondansetron with metoclopramide for prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing major gynecological surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, 382 female patients received either ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg intravenous administration immediately before the induction of anesthesia. A standard general anesthetic technique was employed throughout. Nausea, vomiting, and safety assessments were performed continuously during the 24 h postoperative period.

RESULTS

Of the 380 patients evaluated, significantly fewer ondansetron 4 mg treated patients (89/189; 47%) experienced postoperative nausea and/or vomiting compared with metoclopramide treated patients (115/ 191; 60%) during the study period (p = 0.007, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.66). Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic use of ondansetron is more effective than metoclopramide for preventing PONV in patients undergoing major gynecological surgery.

摘要

背景

术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍是全身麻醉后一个非常棘手的伴随现象。本研究旨在比较昂丹司琼与甲氧氯普胺在预防妇科大手术患者PONV方面的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,382例女性患者在麻醉诱导前即刻分别接受4mg昂丹司琼或10mg甲氧氯普胺静脉注射。全程采用标准的全身麻醉技术。术后24小时内持续进行恶心、呕吐及安全性评估。

结果

在380例评估患者中,研究期间,与甲氧氯普胺治疗组(115/191;60%)相比,4mg昂丹司琼治疗组术后出现恶心和/或呕吐的患者明显更少(89/189;47%)(p = 0.007,95%CI:1.07,1.66)。两组术后不良事件无显著差异。

结论

在预防妇科大手术患者的PONV方面,预防性使用昂丹司琼比甲氧氯普胺更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验