Suppr超能文献

三种美学材料表面抛光系统的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials.

作者信息

Bouvier D, Duprez J P, Lissac M

机构信息

Section of Biomaterials, UFR Odontologie, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Dec;24(12):888-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00603.x.

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of three different polishing methods on a resin composite, a glass ionomer cement (GIC) and a compomer. Thirty samples of each material were prepared. Ten of them were randomly assigned to one of the three polishing methods. The surface roughness (Ra) of the samples were measured before and after the polishing procedure with a profilometer. There was no statistical difference between the composite and the compomer prior to polishing but statistical difference was found between the GIC and the two other materials. After polishing, the smoothest surfaces were obtained using Sof-Lex discs for the three materials, and the roughest surface, with tungsten carbide burs for the composite and the compomer, and with Enhance kit for the GIC. The composite gave the smoothest surface with the three methods.

摘要

本研究比较了三种不同抛光方法对树脂复合材料、玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和复合体的效果。每种材料制备30个样本。其中10个随机分配到三种抛光方法中的一种。在抛光程序前后,使用轮廓仪测量样本的表面粗糙度(Ra)。在抛光前,复合材料和复合体之间没有统计学差异,但GIC与其他两种材料之间存在统计学差异。抛光后,三种材料使用Sof-Lex圆盘获得最光滑的表面,而复合材料和复合体使用碳化钨车针、GIC使用Enhance套装获得最粗糙的表面。使用这三种方法,复合材料的表面最光滑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验