Hays J C, Landerman L R, George L K, Flint E P, Koenig H G, Land K C, Blazer D G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, USA.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998 Jan;53(1):P31-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p31.
Few investigations of the social correlates of depressive symptomatology have addressed variation in the correlates across multiple dimensions of depression scales. We examined the relationships of selected social, clinical, and demographic correlates with four dimensions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale in 3,401 community-dwelling elders in the Piedmont area of North Carolina. These correlates explained significant variation in somatic complaints and depressed affect; effects of chronic disability and recent negative events were particularly robust. Having a confidant explained reduced symptomatology for all four dimensions, but particularly for low positive affect and interpersonal problems. Positive affect was also buttressed by helping others. These patterns have particular relevance where treatment for depression is divorced from considerations of the social environment of the elderly patient.
很少有关于抑郁症状社会关联因素的研究探讨抑郁量表多个维度上关联因素的差异。我们在北卡罗来纳州皮埃蒙特地区的3401名社区居住老年人中,研究了选定的社会、临床和人口统计学关联因素与流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)四个维度之间的关系。这些关联因素解释了躯体不适和抑郁情绪方面的显著差异;慢性残疾和近期负面事件的影响尤为显著。有知己可以解释所有四个维度症状的减轻,尤其是在低积极情绪和人际问题方面。帮助他人也能增强积极情绪。在抑郁症治疗与老年患者社会环境考虑脱节的情况下,这些模式具有特殊的相关性。