• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别在我们后院:媒体对社区反对手机信号塔的报道——桑德曼风险认知愤怒模型的应用

Not in our back yard: media coverage of community opposition to mobile phone towers--an application of Sandman's outrage model of risk perception.

作者信息

Chapman S, Wutzke S

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Oct;21(6):614-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01765.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01765.x
PMID:9470268
Abstract

Australia has the world's second highest per capita use of mobile phones. To meet rapid expansion in use, transmission towers are being erected hastily, backed by federal government exemptions from normal local government planning procedures. In a case study of media reportage of a successful resident protest about the placement of transmitters adjacent to a kindergarten, uncertain risks to health were the ostensible concerns voiced by the protesters. Eleven of the 12 primary components and six out of eight secondary components of Sandman's model of community risk perception were consistent with both the protesters' expressed concerns about the transmission towers and the way in which the issues involved were framed by the media.

摘要

澳大利亚的人均手机使用率位居世界第二。为满足手机使用的快速增长,在联邦政府豁免正常地方政府规划程序的支持下,发射塔正在仓促架设。在一个关于媒体报道居民成功抗议发射机放置在幼儿园附近的案例研究中,健康方面的不确定风险是抗议者表面上表达的担忧。桑德曼社区风险认知模型的12个主要因素中的11个以及8个次要因素中的6个,与抗议者对发射塔表达的担忧以及媒体对所涉问题的表述方式均相符。

相似文献

1
Not in our back yard: media coverage of community opposition to mobile phone towers--an application of Sandman's outrage model of risk perception.别在我们后院:媒体对社区反对手机信号塔的报道——桑德曼风险认知愤怒模型的应用
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Oct;21(6):614-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01765.x.
2
Community panics about mobile phone towers.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998;22(3 Suppl):406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01403.x.
3
A lesson from kindergarten on mobile phones.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Oct;21(6):555-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01752.x.
4
Mobile phones and your health.手机与你的健康。
Pathology. 2001 Aug;33(3):269-70.
5
Radio-frequency electromagnetic field from mobile phones.
Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):576-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79287-4.
6
Health hazards of mobile phones: an Indian perspective.手机的健康危害:印度视角
J Assoc Physicians India. 2008 Nov;56:893-7.
7
Assessment of radiofrequency/microwave radiation emitted by the antennas of rooftop-mounted mobile phone base stations.对安装在屋顶的移动电话基站天线所发射的射频/微波辐射的评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;121(2):122-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci373. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
8
Mobile phone radiation and the risk of cancer; a review.手机辐射与癌症风险;综述
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2008 Jun;37(2):107-18.
9
Survey of RF exposure levels from mobile telephone base stations in Australia.澳大利亚移动电话基站射频辐射暴露水平调查。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2006 Jan;27(1):73-6. doi: 10.1002/bem.20174.
10
[On the evaluation of the influence of cellular phones on their users].[关于手机对其用户影响的评估]
Med Tr Prom Ekol. 1999(9):20-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking back to look forward: 5G/COVID-19 conspiracies and the long history of infrastructural fears.回首往昔,展望未来:5G与新冠疫情阴谋论以及对基础设施的长期恐惧历史。
Mob Media Commun. 2023 May;11(2):174-192. doi: 10.1177/20501579221133950. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
[Risk communication in the containment of the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and promising approaches].[新冠疫情防控中的风险沟通:挑战与可行方法]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Mar;64(3):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03283-3. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures in kindergarten children.
幼儿园儿童的射频电磁场暴露。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.55. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Fomenting Sickness: Nocebo Priming of Residents about Expected Wind Turbine Health Harms.诱发疾病:对居民进行预期风力涡轮机健康危害的反安慰剂效应启动。
Front Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;2:279. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00279. eCollection 2014.
5
Would society pay more attention to injuries if the injury control community paid more attention to risk communication science?如果伤害预防领域更多地关注风险沟通科学,社会是否会更加重视伤害问题?
Inj Prev. 2006 Apr;12(2):71-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.008839.