Ngo H, Ruben J, Arends J, White D, Mount G J, Peters M C, Faller R V, Pfarrer A
Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Adv Dent Res. 1997 Nov;11(4):426-32. doi: 10.1177/08959374970110040801.
In cardiology and research involving the interactions between restorative materials and dental hard tissues, it is important for small changes in tooth mineral content to be measurable. Currently, transverse microradiography (TMR) is the most accepted tool for the above purpose. Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) can yield both qualitative identification of elements and quantitative compositional information. The purpose of this study was to compare the mineral distribution in well-defined artificial lesions, in dentin and enamel, by the use of both TMR and EPMA on the same sample. The good correlation between the two sets of data validates EPMA as a technique and helps in the interpretation of its results. The data from TMR analysis are expressed as vol% of mineral, while EPMA gives the levels of Ca and phosphate in wt%. The conversion between the two sets of data is complicated by the fact that local density is, as yet, unknown.
在心脏病学以及涉及修复材料与牙齿硬组织相互作用的研究中,能够测量牙齿矿物质含量的微小变化非常重要。目前,横向微射线照相术(TMR)是用于上述目的的最被认可的工具。电子探针微量分析(EPMA)既能对元素进行定性鉴定,又能提供定量的成分信息。本研究的目的是通过对同一样本使用TMR和EPMA来比较牙本质和牙釉质中明确界定的人工病变部位的矿物质分布。两组数据之间的良好相关性验证了EPMA作为一种技术的有效性,并有助于对其结果进行解释。TMR分析的数据以矿物质的体积百分比表示,而EPMA给出的是钙和磷的重量百分比水平。由于局部密度目前尚不清楚,两组数据之间的转换很复杂。