Suppr超能文献

系统性血管炎中环磷酰胺治疗的优化

Optimisation of cyclophosphamide therapy in systemic vasculitis.

作者信息

Richmond R, McMillan T W, Luqmani R A

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998 Jan;34(1):79-90. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199834010-00004.

Abstract

There is no doubt that the prognosis for systemic vasculitides has been considerably improved by the use of immunosuppressive agents, chiefly cyclophosphamide. Increasingly, we are becoming aware of the enormous burden of chronic 'grumbling' disease, the high incidence of relapse and the longer term effects of toxic therapy in these patients. The general approach is more intense therapy (with intermittent high dose 'pulses' or lower dose continuous cyclophosphamide) in the initial phase of therapy to induce remission, followed by a less toxic therapy in the maintenance phase (either longer intervals between pulses or a switch to a less toxic drug, such as azathioprine). The pathogenetic mechanisms in vasculitis, which are becoming more precisely defined, are diverse, but cyclophosphamide remains the drug of choice. A number of different cyclophosphamide regimens are in use, which reflects the current dilemma of trying to balance effectiveness with toxicity in diseases where the quality of long term survival remains unsatisfactory. Evidence from controlled trials does not support major differences in immediate outcome between different regimens of cyclophosphamide. Future studies need to address the use of agents designed to interfere precisely with the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms. Alternative approaches should also be considered, for example the use of sublethal doses of cyclophosphamide, with autologous bone marrow rescue, which may achieve long lasting remission or even cure.

摘要

毫无疑问,免疫抑制剂(主要是环磷酰胺)的使用已使系统性血管炎的预后得到显著改善。我们越来越意识到这些患者慢性“隐匿性”疾病的巨大负担、高复发率以及毒性治疗的长期影响。一般方法是在治疗初始阶段采用更强化的治疗(间歇性高剂量“冲击”或低剂量持续使用环磷酰胺)以诱导缓解,随后在维持阶段采用毒性较小的治疗(要么脉冲给药间隔更长,要么换用毒性较小的药物,如硫唑嘌呤)。血管炎的发病机制正得到更精确的界定,其机制多种多样,但环磷酰胺仍是首选药物。目前正在使用多种不同的环磷酰胺治疗方案,这反映了在长期生存质量仍不尽人意的疾病中,试图在有效性和毒性之间取得平衡的当前困境。对照试验的证据并不支持不同环磷酰胺治疗方案在近期疗效上存在重大差异。未来的研究需要关注旨在精确干扰潜在发病机制的药物的使用。还应考虑其他方法,例如使用亚致死剂量的环磷酰胺并进行自体骨髓挽救,这可能实现持久缓解甚至治愈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验