Bachant J L, Adler E
Psychoanalytic Institute, Postgraduate Center for Mental Health, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1997;45(4):1097-120.
Contemporary understandings of transference diverge around the issue of whether transference is co-constructed by both parties to the analytic interaction or brought to it by each participant. Examining the evolution of the concept of transference distills some of the issues inherent in this controversy. It is suggested that each of these conceptualizations contributes something essential to the development of a broader picture of the way transference functions in the clinical setting. If transference is viewed as a process operating along a continuum of repression, both co-construction of the interaction and the primitive wishes, fears, and fantasies brought to the interaction can be parsimoniously accounted for. Adaptive and archaic transference activity are distinguished, and the two dimensions of transference, dynamically interconnected, are shown to be essential aspects of analytic understanding.
当代对移情的理解在这样一个问题上存在分歧，即移情是由分析性互动的双方共同构建的，还是由每个参与者带入这种互动的。审视移情概念的演变，可以提炼出这场争议中固有的一些问题。有人认为，这些概念化的每一种都为更全面地描绘移情在临床环境中的运作方式做出了一些重要贡献。如果将移情视为一个沿着压抑连续体运作的过程，那么互动的共同构建以及带入互动中的原始愿望、恐惧和幻想都可以得到简洁的解释。区分了适应性和古老的移情活动，并且表明这两个动态相互关联的移情维度是分析理解的重要方面。
