• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌后牙区骨吸收后的窦底提升术。牙槽嵴顶入路与侧方入路的比较。

Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches.

作者信息

Zitzmann N U, Schärer P

机构信息

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90391-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90391-2
PMID:9474608
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare three different methods for sinus elevation: (1) the lateral antrostomy as a two-step procedure, (2) the lateral antrostomy as a one-step procedure, and (3) the osteotome technique with a crestal approach. Indication criteria were defined, based on the residual bone height measured from computed tomography scans, for the sake of applying the appropriate technique.

STUDY

In 30 patients designated for implant treatment in the resorbed posterior maxilla, 79 implants were placed in combination with a bone-grafting material for sinus augmentation. The final bone heights were measured from panoramic radiographs or post-operative computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

The success rate for the osteotome technique was 95% during the 30-month study period; no failures occurred in any site treated with a lateral antrostomy. The gain in bone height was comparable for the one-step (median = 10 mm) and two-step (median = 12.7 mm) lateral antrostomies. These sites exhibited a significantly greater increase in bone height (p < 0.001) than did the sites in which the osteotome technique was applied (mean = 3.5 mm). The histologic sections showed both bone apposition in intimate contact with the bone-grafting material particles and initial signs of its remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the osteotome technique can be recommended when more than 6 mm of residual bone height is present and an increase of about 3 to 4 mm is expected. In cases of more advanced resorption a one-step or two-step lateral antrostomy has to be performed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较三种不同的上颌窦提升方法:(1)作为两步法的外侧上颌窦开窗术;(2)作为一步法的外侧上颌窦开窗术;(3)采用嵴顶入路的骨凿技术。基于计算机断层扫描测量的剩余骨高度定义了适应症标准,以便应用合适的技术。

研究

在30例计划于上颌后牙区行种植治疗的患者中,共植入79枚种植体,并联合使用骨移植材料进行上颌窦增高术。通过全景X线片或术后计算机断层扫描测量最终的骨高度。

结果

在30个月的研究期间,骨凿技术的成功率为95%;采用外侧上颌窦开窗术治疗的任何部位均未出现失败病例。一步法(中位数 = 10 mm)和两步法(中位数 = 12.7 mm)外侧上颌窦开窗术的骨高度增加相当。这些部位的骨高度增加显著大于采用骨凿技术的部位(平均值 = 3.5 mm)(p < 0.001)。组织学切片显示骨与骨移植材料颗粒紧密接触并有骨附着,以及其重塑的初始迹象。

结论

结果表明,当剩余骨高度超过6 mm且预期增加约3至4 mm时,可推荐使用骨凿技术。在吸收更严重的情况下,必须进行一步法或两步法外侧上颌窦开窗术。

相似文献

1
Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches.上颌后牙区骨吸收后的窦底提升术。牙槽嵴顶入路与侧方入路的比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90391-2.
2
Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.使用(经牙槽嵴)骨凿技术进行上颌窦底提升术,有无植入材料。第一部分:种植体存留率及患者感受。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):667-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study.内镜控制下骨凿上颌窦底提升术:一项初步前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):557-66.
4
[Crestal core elevation technique--case series and literature review].[嵴顶骨核提升技术——病例系列及文献综述]
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2008 Apr;25(2):27-35, 74.
5
Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in grafted biomaterial sockets: 3 years of follow-up.骨凿窦底提升术联合生物材料种植窝同期植入:3 年随访结果。
J Periodontol. 2010 Mar;81(3):344-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090477.
6
Osteotome sinus floor elevation using Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin as grafting material: a 1-year prospective pilot study with microthreaded implants.使用舒可复富血小板纤维蛋白作为移植材料的骨凿上颌窦底提升术:一项针对微螺纹种植体的1年前瞻性初步研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 May;105(5):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.021. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
7
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
8
A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years.一项对在少量和中度剩余牙槽嵴骨的上颌窦内植入物的前瞻性研究:1 至 5 年后的结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):1203-12.
9
Placement of tapered implants using an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone grafting: 1-year results.使用骨凿进行上颌窦底提升技术且不植骨植入锥形种植体:1年随访结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):727-33.
10
Osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting material: 3-year results of a prospective pilot study.不使用植骨材料的骨凿上颌窦底提升技术:一项前瞻性初步研究的3年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):701-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01696.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Implant Rehabilitation of Posterior Maxillary Edentulism via Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Window Technique: A Retrospective Analysis of 289 Implants Followed Up for 15 Years.经外侧开窗技术上颌窦提升术对后牙区无牙颌患者进行牙种植修复:289颗种植体15年随访的回顾性分析
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Feb 13;16(2):65. doi: 10.3390/jfb16020065.
2
Evolving Techniques and Trends in Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedures in Implant Dentistry: A Review of Contemporary Advances.种植牙学中上颌窦提升术的技术演变与趋势:当代进展综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71424. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71424. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Osseodensification technique in crestal maxillary sinus elevation-A narrative review.
上颌窦嵴顶提升术中的骨致密化技术——一项叙述性综述
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13399. doi: 10.1111/cid.13399. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling versus the Conventional Surgical Technique on Implant Stability: A Clinical Trial.骨致密化钻孔术与传统手术技术对种植体稳定性的有效性:一项临床试验
J Clin Med. 2024 May 15;13(10):2912. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102912.
5
Resorption Rates of Bone Graft Materials after Crestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Its Influencing Factors.上颌窦嵴顶提升术后骨移植材料的吸收速率及其影响因素
J Funct Biomater. 2024 May 17;15(5):133. doi: 10.3390/jfb15050133.
6
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Installation via Osseodensification Drills: A Retrospective Analysis of Bone Gain in 72 Patients Followed for 6 Months.通过骨致密化钻进行上颌窦底提升并同期种植体植入:对72例患者随访6个月的骨增量回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 11;13(8):2225. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082225.
7
Association of the Osseodensification Technique with Soft Tissue Substitute in a Limitrophe Edentulous Area: A Clinical Case Report with 5-Year Follow-Up.骨致密化技术与限界性无牙区软组织替代物的联合应用:一项5年随访的临床病例报告
Case Rep Dent. 2024 Feb 5;2024:6509451. doi: 10.1155/2024/6509451. eCollection 2024.
8
Longitudinal Study of Bone Height Change between Two Approaches for Sinus Floor Elevation.两种提升窦底方法的骨高度变化的纵向研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 12;59(6):1132. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061132.
9
Efficacy of simultaneous placement of dental implants in osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with and without bone augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在骨凿介导的上颌窦底提升术中同时植入牙种植体并进行或不进行骨增量的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):31-39. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_196_21. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Survival rate of dental implant placed using various maxillary sinus floor elevation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis.各种上颌窦底提升技术种植体的存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):215-224. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_283_22.