Geller C, Goette A, Carlson M D, Esperer H D, Hartung W M, Auricchio A, Klein H U
Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Magdeburg, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jan;21(1 Pt 2):303-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01110.x.
An increase in sinus rate has been previously described in patients with AV node reentry (AVNRT) following successful AV node modification. This increase could either be a specific sign of elimination of slow pathway conduction or it could be a consequence of energy application in the posteroseptal area. Thus, we compared the changes in sinus cycle length following successful slow pathway ablation (defined as complete elimination of dual AV node physiology) in patients having AVNRT with those in patients undergoing successful ablation of a posteroseptal atrioventricular accessory connection. Twenty five patients (16 women and 9 men, mean age 41 +/- 4 years) with typical AVNRT (cycle length 378 +/- 12 ms) and 29 patients (16 women and 13 men, age 34 +/- 5 years) with an accessory connection (17 manifest and 12 concealed) were studied. The electrophysiology study was performed during sedation with Fentanyl and Midazolam. The mean number of energy applications was 3 +/- 1 for successful slow pathway ablation and 4 +/- 1 for successful ablation of the accessory connection (p:NS). Following the successful energy application, the sinus cycle length decreased significantly 776 ms at baseline to 691 ms in patients with AVNRT. Following successful ablation of the posteroseptal AC, sinus cycle length decreased from 755 ms at baseline to 664 ms (p < 0.05 in both groups [difference between groups not significant]). The decrease in sinus cycle length did not correlate with the number of RF energy applications required for successful ablation or the total energy delivered. In conclusion, ablation of the AV node slow pathway and a posteroseptal accessory connection results in similar increases in the sinus rate. Thus, the increase in sinus rate is probably due to energy application in the posteroseptal space, possibly due to concomitant destruction of vagal inputs, and it is not specific for elimination of slow pathway conduction.
先前已有描述,房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者在成功进行房室结改良后窦性心率会增加。这种增加可能是慢径路传导消除的特异性征象,也可能是后间隔区域施加能量的结果。因此,我们比较了成功消融慢径路(定义为完全消除房室结双径路生理现象)的AVNRT患者与成功消融后间隔房室旁道连接的患者窦性周期长度的变化。研究了25例典型AVNRT患者(16例女性和9例男性,平均年龄41±4岁,心动周期长度378±12毫秒)和29例有旁道连接的患者(16例女性和13例男性,年龄34±5岁,其中17例显性和12例隐匿性)。电生理研究在使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑镇静期间进行。成功消融慢径路的平均能量施加次数为3±1次,成功消融旁道连接的平均能量施加次数为4±1次(p:无显著性差异)。成功施加能量后,AVNRT患者的窦性周期长度从基线时的776毫秒显著降至691毫秒。成功消融后间隔旁道后,窦性周期长度从基线时的755毫秒降至664毫秒(两组均p<0.05 [组间差异无显著性])。窦性周期长度的缩短与成功消融所需的射频能量施加次数或总能量输送无关。总之,消融房室结慢径路和后间隔旁道连接会导致窦性心率出现类似的增加。因此,窦性心率增加可能是由于后间隔区域施加能量,可能是由于伴随的迷走神经输入破坏,而并非慢径路传导消除所特有。