Madsen K L, Adams W C, Van Loan M D
Department of Exercise Science, University of California Davis, 95616, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jan;30(1):114-20. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199801000-00016.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between body weight and composition, muscular strength, physical activity, and bone mineral density (BMD) in eumenorrheic college-aged women.
BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the total body, and BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck (via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), as well as body composition and muscular strength, were measured in 60 college-aged women. The women were divided into three groups: 1) low body weight athletes involved in weight-bearing, collegiate sports (N = 20), 2) matched low body weight and sedentary (N = 20), and 3) average body weight and sedentary (N = 20). All groups were matched for height, age, and age at menarche.
The athletes had significantly greater (P < 0.05) (mean +/- SD) total body BMD (1.164 +/- 0.06 g x cm[-2]), L2-L4 BMD (1.240 +/- 0.13 g x cm[-2]), femoral neck BMD (1.144 +/- 0.13 g x cm[-2]) and total body BMC (2.44 +/- 0.30 kg) than the low body weight, sedentary (LWS) group, but were only greater than the average body weight sedentary group (AWS) for femoral neck BMD. Significant correlations were found between lean body mass (LBM) and all BMD variables (P < 0.001). A significant correlation (P < 0.01) was found between fat mass and all BMD variables in the sedentary subjects alone (N = 40), but with inclusion of the athletes (N = 60), none of the correlations between fat mass and BMD were significant. Arm and leg strength isometric torque values corrected for muscle + bone cross-sectional area (M + B CSA) were not significantly different between the athletes and LWS group, but the athletes were greater (P < 0.05) than the AWS group for both arm and leg strength/M + B CSA. No significant, site-specific correlations were found between strength/M + B and BMD.
In summary, the athletes had significantly greater BMD, BMC, and LBM than the LWS group and, except for a greater femoral neck BMD, similar BMD, BMC, and LBM as the AWS group. These results suggest that LBM and weight-bearing exercise both enhance BMD in eumenorrheic young adult women.
本研究旨在探讨月经正常的大学适龄女性的体重与身体成分、肌肉力量、身体活动及骨密度(BMD)之间的关系。
对60名大学适龄女性测量了全身的骨密度和骨矿物质含量(BMC)、腰椎(L2-L4)和股骨颈的骨密度(通过双能X线吸收法),以及身体成分和肌肉力量。这些女性被分为三组:1)参与负重大学体育运动的低体重运动员(N = 20),2)匹配的低体重久坐女性(N = 20),3)正常体重久坐女性(N = 20)。所有组在身高、年龄和初潮年龄方面进行了匹配。
与低体重久坐(LWS)组相比,运动员的全身骨密度(1.164±0.06 g×cm[-2])、L2-L4骨密度(1.240±0.13 g×cm[-2])、股骨颈骨密度(1.144±0.13 g×cm[-2])和全身BMC(2.44±0.30 kg)显著更高(P < 0.05),但仅股骨颈骨密度高于正常体重久坐组(AWS)。瘦体重(LBM)与所有骨密度变量之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.001)。仅在久坐受试者(N = 40)中,脂肪量与所有骨密度变量之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.01),但纳入运动员(N = 60)后,脂肪量与骨密度之间的所有相关性均不显著。校正肌肉+骨骼横截面积(M + B CSA)后的手臂和腿部力量等长扭矩值在运动员和LWS组之间无显著差异,但运动员的手臂和腿部力量/M + B CSA均高于AWS组(P < 0.05)。力量/M + B与骨密度之间未发现显著的部位特异性相关性。
总之,与LWS组相比,运动员的骨密度、BMC和LBM显著更高,除股骨颈骨密度较高外,与AWS组的骨密度、BMC和LBM相似。这些结果表明,瘦体重和负重运动均可增强月经正常的年轻成年女性的骨密度。