Lloyd A, Gutmann J, Dummer P, Newcombe R
Department of Restorative Sciences, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas 75246-2013, USA.
Int Endod J. 1997 May;30(3):196-204. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00070.x.
The in vitro sealing ability of the root-canal sealer Diaket when used as a root-end filling material was compared with that of amalgam using linear micro-leakage of Indian ink. Eight groups of 20 extracted teeth each were formed, plus 12 control teeth as follows: 1) root-end resection of 45 degrees bevel, root-end cavity preparation with an 008 round bur, amalgam root-end filling; 2) 45 degrees bevel, bur, Diaket; 3) 45 degrees bevel, using a sonic retro-prep tip, amalgam; 4) 45 degrees bevel, sonic, Diaket; 5) no bevel, bur, amalgam; 6) no bevel, bur, Diaket; 7) no bevel, sonic, amalgam; 8) no bevel, sonic, Diaket. Root-end cavity depths of 3 mm were prepared. Specimens were immersed in Indian ink for 2 weeks. The teeth were demineralized, rendered transparent and linear dye penetration recorded. Results showed that Diaket provided a superior seal to amalgam irrespective of the root-end preparation. The degree of bevel of the resected root-end did not influence leakage. Sonic instrumentation resulted in a larger root-end cavity than with burs.
使用印度墨水的线性微渗漏法,比较了根管封闭剂Diaket作为根尖充填材料时与汞合金的体外封闭能力。共形成八组,每组20颗拔除的牙齿,外加12颗对照牙,具体如下:1)45度斜面根尖切除术,用008圆钻制备根尖腔,汞合金根尖充填;2)45度斜面,钻,Diaket;3)45度斜面,使用超声倒预备头,汞合金;4)45度斜面,超声,Diaket;5)无斜面,钻,汞合金;6)无斜面,钻,Diaket;7)无斜面,超声,汞合金;8)无斜面,超声,Diaket。制备3mm深的根尖腔。将标本浸入印度墨水中2周。对牙齿进行脱矿、透明处理并记录线性染料渗透情况。结果表明,无论根尖预备情况如何,Diaket的封闭效果均优于汞合金。切除根尖的斜面角度不影响渗漏。超声器械预备导致的根尖腔比用钻预备的更大。