Mehta R J, Diefenbach B, Brown A, Cullen E, Jonczyk A, Güssow D, Luckenbach G A, Goodman S L
Merck London, MRC Collaborative Centre, 1-3 Burtonhole Lane, Mill Hill, London NW71AD, U.K.
Biochem J. 1998 Mar 1;330 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):861-9. doi: 10.1042/bj3300861.
The molecular mechanisms of alphavbeta3 integrin affinity regulation have important biological implications in tumour development, wound repair and angiogenesis. We expressed, purified and characterized recombinant forms of human alphavbeta3 (r-alphavbeta3) and compared the activation state of these with alphavbeta3 in its cellular environment. The ligand specificity and selectivity of recombinant full-length and double transmembrane truncations of r-alphavbeta3 cloned in BacPAK6 vectors and expressed in Sf9 and High Five insect cells were compared with those of native placental alphavbeta3 and the receptor in situ on the cell surface. r-alphavbeta3 integrins were purified by affinity chromatography from detergent extracts of cells (full-length), and from the culture medium of cells expressing double-truncated r-alphavbeta3. r-alphavbeta3 had the same epitopes, ligand-binding specificities, bivalent cation requirements and susceptibility to RGD-containing peptides as native alphavbeta3. On M21-L4 melanoma cells, alphavbeta3 mediated binding to vitronectin, but not to fibrinogen unless activated with Mn2+. Non-activated alphaIIbbeta3 integrin as control in M21-L-IIb cells had the opposite profile, mediating binding to fibrinogen, but not to vitronectin unless activated with Mn2+. Thus these receptors had moderate to low ligand affinity. In marked contrast, purified alphavbeta3 receptors, with or without transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, were constitutively of high affinity and able to bind strongly to vitronectin, fibronectin and fibrinogen under physiological conditions. Our data suggest that, in contrast with the positive regulation of alphaIIbbeta3 in situ, intracellular controls lower the affinity of alphavbeta3, and the cytoplasmic domains may act as a target for negative regulators of alphavbeta3 activity.
αvβ3整合素亲和力调节的分子机制在肿瘤发展、伤口修复和血管生成中具有重要的生物学意义。我们表达、纯化并鉴定了重组人αvβ3(r-αvβ3)的形式,并将其激活状态与细胞环境中的αvβ3进行了比较。将克隆于BacPAK6载体并在Sf9和High Five昆虫细胞中表达的r-αvβ3重组全长和双跨膜截短体的配体特异性和选择性,与天然胎盘αvβ3和细胞表面原位受体的配体特异性和选择性进行了比较。r-αvβ3整合素通过亲和层析从细胞(全长)的去污剂提取物以及表达双截短r-αvβ3的细胞培养基中纯化得到。r-αvβ3与天然αvβ3具有相同的表位、配体结合特异性、二价阳离子需求以及对含RGD肽的敏感性。在M21-L4黑色素瘤细胞上,αvβ3介导与玻连蛋白的结合,但除非用Mn2+激活,否则不与纤维蛋白原结合。作为对照的M21-L-IIb细胞中的未激活αIIbβ3整合素具有相反的情况,介导与纤维蛋白原的结合,但除非用Mn2+激活,否则不与玻连蛋白结合。因此,这些受体具有中等至低的配体亲和力。与之形成鲜明对比的是,纯化的αvβ3受体,无论有无跨膜和胞质结构域,在生理条件下都具有组成性的高亲和力,能够与玻连蛋白、纤连蛋白和纤维蛋白原强烈结合。我们的数据表明,与原位αIIbβ3的正向调节相反,细胞内控制降低了αvβ3的亲和力,并且胞质结构域可能作为αvβ3活性负调节因子的作用靶点。