• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The use of Fourier analysis in the calculation of trough to peak ratio from ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

作者信息

Diamant M, Idema R N, Vincent H H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Jan;12(1):61-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000546.

DOI:10.1038/sj.jhh.1000546
PMID:9482136
Abstract

The trough:peak (T:P) ratio serves as an index of efficacy of antihypertensive drugs with respect to their dose and dose interval. There is no consensus regarding the method for the calculation of the T:P ratio. We assessed the influences of curve smoothing, the average fall in 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the length of the peak effect period on the result of T:P ratio calculation. Forty-two patients with essential hypertension (aged 27-81 years; 20 males) had a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement on two occasions. The first was performed at baseline, the second after 12 weeks of treatment with a beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, calcium slow-channel blocker, diuretic or a centrally acting drug, all taken once daily. BP data were analysed both by Fourier analysis (FA) with four harmonics and by time block analysis (TBA). The peak effect was defined as the maximum drop in MAP over a period of 0 to 3 h following drug intake at any time in the 24 h, and the trough effect as the fall in MAP over the last 2 h of the dose interval. FA gave higher T:P ratio values than TBA (0.51 vs 0.43; P < 0.05) and the variability of the results was reduced by FA (FA: 0.49-0.52; TBA: 0.35-0.46). A greater fall in 24-h MAP was associated with a higher T:P ratio (r = 0.42, P < 0.02; TBA: r = 0.31, P = 0.09). Half of the patients whose fall in 24-h MAP after treatment was <10 mm Hg, had higher trough BP values, resulting in negative T:P ratios. With increasing length of the peak period, the calculated peak effect was reduced and the T:P ratio increased (both FA and TBA: P < 0.001). The mean trough responses during the last 2 h of the dose interval were similar after TBA and FA. Based on these data, we recommend the use of FA for calculation of T:P ratios, especially when the magnitude of the antihypertensive effect is small. We also suggest using peak- and trough-effect periods of 2 h each. Whenever T:P ratios are calculated, the method used for curve smoothing and the length of peak- and trough-effect periods should be specified in order to obtain meaningful results. T:P ratios need to be interpreted individually together with the magnitude of the antihypertensive drug effect and the circadian BP profile.

摘要

相似文献

1
The use of Fourier analysis in the calculation of trough to peak ratio from ambulatory blood pressure measurements.
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Jan;12(1):61-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000546.
2
Lisinopril versus enalapril: evaluation of trough:peak ratio by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.赖诺普利与依那普利对比:通过动态血压监测评估谷峰比值
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Jun;13(6):405-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000821.
3
Calculation of trough:peak ratio of antihypertensive treatment from ambulatory blood pressure: methodological aspects.基于动态血压的降压治疗谷峰比计算:方法学方面
J Hypertens. 1995 Oct;13(10):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199510000-00005.
4
The trough-to-peak ratio as an instrument to evaluate antihypertensive drugs. The APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension Trial.谷峰比值作为评估抗高血压药物的一种手段。动态血压与高血压治疗试验研究人员。
Hypertension. 1995 Dec;26(6 Pt 1):942-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.942.
5
Trough-to-peak versus surface ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive agents. APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension.
Blood Press. 1995 Nov;4(6):350-7. doi: 10.3109/08037059509077620.
6
Trough:peak ratio and smoothness index in the evaluation of 24-h blood pressure control in hypertension: a comparative study between valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination and amlodipine.谷峰比值和平滑度指数在评估高血压患者24小时血压控制中的应用:缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂与氨氯地平的比较研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jan;57(11):765-70. doi: 10.1007/s00228-001-0393-6.
7
Practical relevance of the 24-hour trough: peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs.抗高血压药物24小时谷值:峰值比的实际意义。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Aug;13(2):S109-12. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199508001-00018.
8
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
9
Reproducibility and clinical value of the trough-to-peak ratio of the antihypertensive effect: evidence from the sample study.降压效果谷峰比的可重复性及临床价值:来自样本研究的证据
Hypertension. 1998 Sep;32(3):424-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.32.3.424.
10
Determining the trough-to-peak ratio in parallel-group trials. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators.
Hypertension. 1997 Feb;29(2):659-67. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.2.659.

引用本文的文献

1
Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure measurements.通过动态血压测量评估新型血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂奥美沙坦酯的降压疗效。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Sep-Oct;4(5):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01051.x.
2
Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension.奥美沙坦、氯沙坦、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦在控制原发性高血压方面的疗效比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2001 Sep-Oct;3(5):283-91, 318. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.01136.x.
3
Importance of various methods of blood pressure measurement in clinical trials.
临床试验中各种血压测量方法的重要性。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000 Aug;2(4):362-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-000-0039-6.