• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种牙种植系统互换部件界面贴合度的扫描电子显微镜评估

Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the interfacial fit of interchanged components of four dental implant systems.

作者信息

Dellow A G, Driessen C H, Nel H J

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Pretoria Faculty of Dentistry, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):216-21.

PMID:9484052
Abstract

The introduction of the original Swedish implant system (Brånemark) was followed by several alternative implant systems with implants and components that closely resembled the original design and treatment protocol. Some of these alternative systems may be interchangeable. Manufacturing variations can result in as much as 0.1 mm of space between the component parts. The implant/abutment interface fit was evaluated by scanning electron micrography for each of four implant systems, as well as interchanged components between the various systems. Results showed that certain implant system abutments are interchangeable, and that the accuracy of fit meets with or exceeds the criteria set by the original Swedish system.

摘要

最初的瑞典种植体系统(布兰内马克系统)推出后,又出现了几种替代种植体系统,其种植体和组件与原始设计及治疗方案极为相似。其中一些替代系统可能是可互换的。制造差异可能导致部件之间出现多达0.1毫米的间隙。通过扫描电子显微镜对四种种植体系统以及不同系统之间互换的组件进行了种植体/基台界面适配性评估。结果表明,某些种植体系统的基台是可互换的,并且适配精度达到或超过了原始瑞典系统设定的标准。

相似文献

1
Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the interfacial fit of interchanged components of four dental implant systems.四种牙种植系统互换部件界面贴合度的扫描电子显微镜评估
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):216-21.
2
Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments, and laboratory analogs.
Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Mar-Apr;8(2):162-78.
3
Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):527-40.
4
The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation.样条植入物:设计、工程与评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Sep-Oct;9(5):419-33.
5
Evaluation of the implant-connection interface using scanning electron microscopy.使用扫描电子显微镜对种植体-连接界面进行评估。
Braz Dent J. 1995;6(1):17-23.
6
Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.Procera定制基台与各种种植系统之间适配精度的评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):652-8.
7
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
8
Marginal fit of prefabricated crowns of the Ha-Ti implant system: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.哈-蒂种植系统预制牙冠的边缘适合性:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Jan-Feb;9(1):87-94.
9
Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.种植体支持修复体的循环加载:当将循环使用的基台替换为成品基台时,修复体与基台界面间隙的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jan;95(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.005.
10
A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.一种用于测量种植体-基台微间隙的分类系统。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):879-85.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Analysis of Structural Integrity and Surface Alterations of Reused Healing Abutments.再利用愈合基台的结构完整性和表面改变的体外分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70064. doi: 10.1111/cid.70064.
2
Engaging vs. Non-Engaging Abutments: An In Vitro Study Evaluating Changes in Microgap and Screw Morphology.功能性基台与非功能性基台:一项评估微间隙和螺钉形态变化的体外研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):265. doi: 10.3390/dj12080265.
3
Long-Term Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gel in Single-Crown Implant Rehabilitation: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.
洗必泰凝胶在单冠种植修复中的长期疗效:一项五年随访研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;11(10):228. doi: 10.3390/dj11100228.
4
In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体基台连接设计中预负荷损失的体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;15(4):1392. doi: 10.3390/ma15041392.
5
Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo-A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study.种植体周围骨吸收的愈合期:0.20%洗必泰凝胶与安慰剂的对比——一项随机双盲对照的人体研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 16;2018:5326340. doi: 10.1155/2018/5326340. eCollection 2018.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.两种相容球帽附着体在下颌种植覆盖义齿中固位性能的比较评价:一项体外研究
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Mar;15(2):106-115.
7
Bacterial contamination along implant-abutment interface in external and internal-hex dental implants.外六边和内六边牙科种植体中种植体-基台界面的细菌污染
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Mar 15;7(3):580-5. eCollection 2014.
8
Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment.循环载荷对预制和铸造种植体单基台垂直不匹配的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):16-21. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000100005.