Megid F Y, Salama F S
Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997 Summer;21(4):305-10.
The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the shear bond strength and fracture pattern of Dyract compomer material with and without use of PSA prime/adhesive as well as 35% phosphoric acid etching to the buccal dentin of primary first and second molars. In addition, micromorphology of the restorative surfaces opposing the tooth structure following these different surface treatments was evaluated. For shear bond strength measurement and fracture pattern evaluation, 36 extracted non-restored human primary molars with mild to moderate caries divided into 3 groups of 12 teeth each were used. Dyract with and without use of PSA prime/adhesive as well as 35% phosphoric acid etching for 15 seconds prior to placement of PSA prime/adhesive was applied to the buccal surface of exposed dentin. A standardized tube of Dyract was placed on each dentin surface and polymerized. The tubes were sheared off with a Universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 12.7 mm/min. For evaluation of the restorative surfaces opposing the tooth structure, 9 teeth divided into 3 groups of 3 teeth each were used to prepare the specimens, which were then demineralized in 10% hydrochloric acid for 24 hours. Fitting surfaces of these specimens were prepared and examined using scanning electron microscope. Tukey's multiple range test showed that the shear bond strength of Dyract with PSA prime/adhesive (group 1) was statistically significantly higher than Dyract without PSA prime/adhesive (group 2) and phosphoric acid etching (group 3). The shear bond strength in group 1 averaged 5.89 +/- 1.40 (X + SD MPa) while for groups 2 and averaged 1.49 +/- 0.69 and 3.69 +/- 0.89 respectively. Pretreatment of dentin surface with 35% phosphoric acid increased resin tags formation but it did significantly lower shear bond strength of Dyract with PSA prime/adhesive to dentin of primary molars. Bond failure patterns for all groups were only adhesive and mixed type failures.
本研究的目的是测量和比较使用和不使用PSA底漆/粘合剂以及用35%磷酸蚀刻乳磨牙颊侧牙本质的情况下,Dyract复合体材料的剪切粘结强度和断裂模式。此外,还评估了经过这些不同表面处理后,修复体与牙齿结构相对的表面的微观形态。为了测量剪切粘结强度和评估断裂模式,使用了36颗拔除的患有轻度至中度龋齿的未修复人类乳磨牙,分为3组,每组12颗牙齿。在暴露的牙本质颊面应用使用和不使用PSA底漆/粘合剂的Dyract,并在放置PSA底漆/粘合剂之前用35%磷酸蚀刻15秒。将标准化的Dyract管放置在每个牙本质表面并聚合。用万能试验机以12.7mm/min的十字头速度将管子剪断。为了评估修复体与牙齿结构相对的表面,使用9颗牙齿,分为3组,每组3颗牙齿来制备标本,然后将其在10%盐酸中脱矿24小时。制备这些标本的贴合面并用扫描电子显微镜检查。Tukey多重极差检验表明,使用PSA底漆/粘合剂的Dyract(第1组)的剪切粘结强度在统计学上显著高于未使用PSA底漆/粘合剂的Dyract(第2组)和磷酸蚀刻组(第3组)。第1组的剪切粘结强度平均为5.89±1.40(X+SD MPa),而第2组和第3组分别平均为1.49±0.69和3.69±0.89。用35%磷酸预处理牙本质表面增加了树脂突的形成,但它确实显著降低了使用PSA底漆/粘合剂的Dyract与乳磨牙牙本质的剪切粘结强度。所有组的粘结失败模式均仅为粘结型和混合型失败。