Cehreli Z C, Usmen E
Department of Pedodontics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Dent. 1999 Feb;12(1):26-30.
To compare the bond strength of two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compomer) to primary and permanent enamel with and without acid-etching and to test for a possible relationship between the determined shear strength values and area of cohesive failure within the materials on the bonding interface.
Two compomer materials (Dyract and Compoglass) with their respective one-bottle primer/adhesive agents (Prime & Bond 2.0 and Syntac Single Component) were investigated. The parameters tested were shear strength and area of cohesive type of failure after debonding of specimens with respect to the total area of the bonding interface.
Mean bond strength to primary enamel ranged from 4.09 MPa (Compoglass) to 5.6 MPa (Dyract), while in permanent enamel the mean values were between 12.3 MPa (Compoglass) and 14.3 MPa (Dyract), when pretreatment was made with bonding agents only. Generally, acid-etching prior to pretreatment improved adhesion significantly (6.0 MPa and 8.1 MPa in primary enamel and 16.0 MPa and 19.4 MPa in permanent enamel for Compoglass and Dyract, respectively). Over one-half of the variation in the values for cohesive failure area was explained by its linear relationship with shear bond strength.
比较两种聚酸改性复合树脂(复合体)在有无酸蚀情况下与乳牙釉质和恒牙釉质的粘结强度,并测试所测定的剪切强度值与粘结界面材料内粘结性破坏面积之间可能存在的关系。
研究了两种复合体材料(Dyract和Compoglass)及其各自的单瓶装底漆/粘结剂(Prime & Bond 2.0和Syntac单组分)。测试的参数是相对于粘结界面总面积,试样脱粘后的剪切强度和粘结性破坏类型的面积。
仅使用粘结剂进行预处理时,与乳牙釉质的平均粘结强度范围为4.09MPa(Compoglass)至5.6MPa(Dyract),而在恒牙釉质中,平均值在12.3MPa(Compoglass)和14.3MPa(Dyract)之间。一般来说,预处理前进行酸蚀可显著提高粘结力(Compoglass和Dyract在乳牙釉质中的粘结力分别为6.0MPa和8.1MPa,在恒牙釉质中分别为16.0MPa和19.4MPa)。粘结性破坏面积值的一半以上变化可通过其与剪切粘结强度的线性关系来解释。