Iglehart J
Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):146-51. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199802000-00012.
Participants at the third meeting of the AAMC's Forum on the Future of Academic Medicine in June 1997 were asked to give their views of what the main characteristics of successful medical schools should be in the year 2010, given that market pressures are becoming increasingly dominant in the health care environment. The most-cited characteristics concerned structure and management systems. Participants were then asked how far along they thought schools had come in acquiring these and other characteristics they had named. There was wide disagreement on this question, but general consensus that a major obstacle to change at most schools is that faculty do not feel a sense of crisis and thus are not motivated to change. A recurring question at all three forum meetings was whether academic medical centers (i.e., medical schools and their associated teaching hospitals) have an obligation to serve the poor in the future health care system where cross-subsidies will have diminished. Some participants said that service to the poor should be financed through some explicit state-federal mechanism. Others agreed, and added that the treatment of the poor is a valuable educational tool. Dr. Cohen, president of the AAMC, updated the forum on the progress of an AAMC effort to improve the capacity of medical schools to understand their financial status. Another topic was how the AAMC can assist its members through the difficult period of change that market imperatives have created. A guest, Nicholas J. DeGrazia, PhD, a former academic administrator and now a specialist at helping troubled private companies, addressed the forum about the conditions that make change happen in organizations and noted that in academic medicine, there is not a sufficiently concise sense of dissatisfaction to spark meaningful change. He also discussed the characteristics of a successful change agent. Dr. Cohen suggested that perhaps the AAMC could organize a seminar on how to prepare change agents in medical schools. As in the two previous meetings, discussions were wide-ranging and candid, and there was a sense that forum members and others should find ways to have similar types of exchanges with their faculties, administrators, and students because time is of the essence as the market marches on.
1997年6月,美国医学院协会(AAMC)学术医学未来论坛第三次会议的与会者被要求谈谈他们对2010年成功医学院校主要特征的看法,因为市场压力在医疗保健环境中日益占据主导地位。被提及最多的特征涉及结构和管理系统。随后,与会者被问及他们认为各院校在获得这些以及他们所提及的其他特征方面进展如何。在这个问题上存在广泛分歧,但普遍的共识是,大多数院校变革的一个主要障碍是教师没有危机感,因此没有变革的动力。在所有三次论坛会议上反复出现的一个问题是,在未来交叉补贴将会减少的医疗保健系统中,学术医疗中心(即医学院及其附属教学医院)是否有义务为贫困人口提供服务。一些与会者表示,为贫困人口提供服务的资金应通过某种明确的州联邦机制来筹集。其他人表示同意,并补充说,治疗贫困人口是一种宝贵的教育工具。AAMC主席科恩博士向论坛介绍了AAMC在提高医学院校了解其财务状况能力方面所做努力的进展情况。另一个话题是AAMC如何帮助其成员度过市场需求所带来的艰难变革时期。一位嘉宾,尼古拉斯·J·德格拉齐亚博士,曾是一名学术管理人员,现在是帮助陷入困境的私营公司的专家,他在论坛上谈到了促使组织发生变革的条件,并指出在学术医学领域,没有足够强烈的不满情绪来引发有意义的变革。他还讨论了成功变革推动者的特征。科恩博士建议,也许AAMC可以组织一次关于如何在医学院校培养变革推动者的研讨会。与前两次会议一样,讨论广泛而坦诚,有一种感觉是,论坛成员和其他人应该找到与他们的教师、管理人员和学生进行类似交流的方式,因为随着市场的发展,时间至关重要。