CMAJ. 1998 Feb 10;158 Suppl 3:S3-8.
To provide information and recommendations for assisting women and their physicians in making the decisions necessary to establish or exclude the presence of cancer when a lump is felt in the breast.
Guidelines are based on a systematic review of published evidence and expert opinion. References were identified through a computerized citation search using MED-LINE (from 1966) and CANCERLIT (from 1985) to January 1996. Nonsystematic review of breast cancer literature continued to January 1997.
Exclusion or confirmation of the presence of cancer with the minimum of intervention and delay.
Investigation of women with a breast lump or suspicious change in breast texture starts with a history, physical examination and usually mammography. The clinical history should establish how long the lump has been noted, whether any change has been observed and whether there is a history of biopsy or breast cancer. Risk factors for breast cancer should be noted, but their presence or absence should not influence the decision to investigate a lump further. The physical examination of the breast should aim to identify those features that distinguish malignant from benign lumps. Mammography can often clarify the nature of the lump and detect clinically occult lesions in either breast. Fine-needle aspiration can establish whether the lump is solid or cystic. When a tumour is solid, cells can be obtained for cytologic examination. Ultrasonography is an alternative method to fine-needle aspiration for distinguishing a cyst from a solid tumour. Whenever reasonable doubt remains as to whether a lump is benign or malignant, a biopsy should be carried out. When surgical biopsy is used, the aim is to remove the whole lump in one piece along with a surrounding cuff of normal tissue. Core biopsy, either clinically or image-guided, can usually establish or exclude malignancy, thus reducing the need for surgical biopsy. Thermography and light scanning are not recommended diagnostic procedures. The value of magnetic resonance imaging is still under investigation. It is not a routine diagnostic procedure at this time. The choice of procedure should take into account the experience of the diagnostician and availability of the technology in question. The work-up should be completed expeditiously and the patient kept fully informed throughout. Even when malignancy is not found, it may be prudent, in some cases, to arrange follow-up surveillance.
Guidelines were reviewed and revised by the Writing Committee, expert primary reviewers, secondary reviewers selected from all regions of Canada and by the Steering Committee. The final document reflects a consensus of all these contributors.
提供信息和建议,以协助女性及其医生在乳房摸到肿块时,做出确定或排除癌症存在所需的决策。
本指南基于对已发表证据和专家意见的系统回顾。通过使用MEDLINE(自1966年起)和CANCERLIT(自1985年起)进行计算机化文献检索,截至1996年1月确定参考文献。对乳腺癌文献的非系统回顾持续至1997年1月。
以最少的干预和延迟排除或确认癌症的存在。
对有乳房肿块或乳房质地可疑变化的女性进行检查,首先要进行病史询问、体格检查,通常还需进行乳房X线摄影。临床病史应明确肿块被发现的时长、是否观察到任何变化以及是否有活检或乳腺癌病史。应记录乳腺癌的危险因素,但其存在与否不应影响对肿块进一步检查的决策。乳房体格检查的目的应是识别那些区分恶性肿块与良性肿块的特征。乳房X线摄影通常可明确肿块的性质,并检测出双侧乳房中临床隐匿的病变。细针穿刺可确定肿块是实性还是囊性。当肿块为实性时,可获取细胞进行细胞学检查。超声检查是区分囊肿与实性肿瘤的另一种替代细针穿刺的方法。只要对肿块是良性还是恶性仍存在合理怀疑,就应进行活检。采用手术活检时,目标是将整个肿块连同周围一圈正常组织完整切除。临床或影像引导下的粗针活检通常可确定或排除恶性肿瘤,从而减少手术活检的必要性。不推荐将热成像和光扫描作为诊断程序。磁共振成像的价值仍在研究中。目前它不是常规诊断程序。检查方法的选择应考虑诊断医生的经验以及相关技术的可及性。检查应迅速完成,并让患者全程充分了解情况。即使未发现恶性肿瘤,在某些情况下安排随访监测可能也是谨慎之举。
写作委员会、专家初审人员、从加拿大所有地区选出的二审人员以及指导委员会对指南进行了审查和修订。最终文件反映了所有这些参与者的共识。