• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用诺瓦菲尔缝线:它会使缝合更容易吗?

Using Novafil: would it make suturing easier?

作者信息

Pinheiro A L, de Castro J F, Thiers F A, Cavalcanti E T, Rêgo T I, de Quevedo A S, Lins A J, Aca C R

机构信息

Departamento de Prótese e Cirurgia Buco-Facial, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 1997;8(1):21-5.

PMID:9485633
Abstract

The use of monofilament nonabsorbable suture materials is not common in Dentistry. Although it is known that multifilament suture materials induce greater cellular reaction, most Dentists prefer to use cotton and silk. Rigidity and package memory are disadvantages of monofilament nonabsorbable suture materials. A new material, Polybutester (Novafil), has been used successfully in Medicine but its use is not common in Dentistry. Seventy male and female Wistar rats were used to study the clinical response of skin and abdominal wall muscle to the use of Novafil and nylon sutures. Under general anesthesia, standard wounds were created in the dorsum and abdomen of the animals and sutured with either Novafil or nylon. The animals were sacrificed immediately, 12, 24, and 72 hours and at 4, 5 and 7 days to evaluate the clinical aspect of both wounds. Polybutester presented some advantages such as strength, lack of package memory, elasticity and flexibility which made suturing quicker and easier. Some subjects presented abdominal wound edema during the period and six animals developed infection of abdominal wounds within seven days. These initial findings show that Novafil is easy to handle and would be better tolerated in the mouth than nylon resulting in less discomfort for the patient. Novafil can be used safely on skin and mucosal wounds and, if necessary, it can be used in internal sutures because it irritates less than nylon.

摘要

单丝不可吸收缝合材料在牙科领域并不常用。尽管已知多丝缝合材料会引发更强的细胞反应,但大多数牙医还是更喜欢使用棉线和丝线。单丝不可吸收缝合材料的缺点是硬度和包装记忆性。一种新型材料聚丁酯(诺菲)已在医学领域成功应用,但其在牙科领域的使用并不普遍。本研究选用70只Wistar大鼠,旨在研究皮肤和腹壁肌肉对诺菲和尼龙缝合线的临床反应。在全身麻醉下,在动物的背部和腹部制造标准伤口,并用诺菲或尼龙进行缝合。在术后即刻、12小时、24小时、72小时以及4天、5天和7天处死动物,以评估两种伤口的临床情况。聚丁酯具有一些优点,如强度高、无包装记忆性、有弹性和柔韧性,这使得缝合更快、更容易。在此期间,部分实验对象出现腹部伤口水肿,7天内有6只动物发生腹部伤口感染。这些初步研究结果表明,诺菲易于操作,在口腔中比尼龙更易耐受,给患者带来的不适更少。诺菲可安全用于皮肤和黏膜伤口,如有必要,也可用于内部缝合,因为它比尼龙的刺激性更小。

相似文献

1
Using Novafil: would it make suturing easier?使用诺瓦菲尔缝线:它会使缝合更容易吗?
Braz Dent J. 1997;8(1):21-5.
2
Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.诺瓦菲尔。一种用于伤口闭合的动态缝线。
Ann Surg. 1986 Aug;204(2):193-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198608000-00015.
3
Nonabsorbable suture material in corneoscleral sections--a comparison of novafil and nylon.角膜巩膜切口使用的不可吸收缝合材料——诺瓦菲尔与尼龙的比较
Ophthalmic Surg. 1989 Jul;20(7):480-5.
4
Comparative study of skin wound closure with polybutester (Novafil) and polypropylene.聚丁酯(诺瓦菲尔)与聚丙烯用于皮肤伤口闭合的比较研究
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1989 Aug;34(4):205-7.
5
Unique performance characteristics of Novafil.诺瓦菲尔的独特性能特点。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Mar;164(3):230-6.
6
Long-term comparison of Novafil and nylon in corneoscleral sections.诺瓦菲尔(Novafil)与尼龙在角膜巩膜切片中的长期比较。
Ophthalmic Surg. 1991 Feb;22(2):74-7.
7
Nonabsorbable suture material in cataract surgery: a comparison of Novafil and nylon.白内障手术中不可吸收缝合材料:诺瓦菲尔(Novafil)与尼龙的比较
Ophthalmic Surg. 1992 Aug;23(8):538-44.
8
Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.缝合材料对皮肤伤口愈合的影响。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Jan;140(1):7-12.
9
[Experiments on new synthetic and non-absorbable surgical threads].[新型合成不可吸收外科缝线的实验]
Polim Med. 1998;28(1-2):33-58.
10
The choice of a suture to close abdominal incisions.用于缝合腹部切口的缝线选择。
Eur Surg Res. 1983;15(2):59-66. doi: 10.1159/000128334.