Prados M D, Scott C B, Rotman M, Rubin P, Murray K, Sause W, Asbell S, Comis R, Curran W, Nelson J, Davis R L, Levin V A, Lamborn K, Phillips T L
Northern California Oncology Group, University of California, San Francisco 94117, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Feb 1;40(3):653-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00770-0.
To examine the effect of treatment using Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during radiation therapy on malignant glioma patient survival by comparing historical survival data from several large clinical trials.
A retrospective analysis of patient data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials 74-01, 79-18, and 83-02 and the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) study 6G-82-1 was conducted. Patient data was supplied by both groups, and analyzed by the RTOG. Pretreatment characteristics including age, extent of surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and histopathology were collected; the only treatment variable evaluated was the use of BrdU during radiation therapy. Radiation dose, dose-fractionation schedule, use of chemotherapy, and/or type of chemotherapy was not controlled for in the analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the potential treatment effect of BrdU on patient survival.
Data from 334 patients treated with BrdU on NCOG 6G-82-1 and 1743 patients treated without BrdU on 3 RTOG studies was received. Patients were excluded from the review if confirmation of eligibility could not be obtained, if the patient was ineligible for the study they entered, if central pathology review was not done, or if radiotherapy data was not available. Patients treated according to the RTOG studies had to start radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery; no such restriction existed for the NCOG studies. To ensure comparability between the studies, patients from the NCOG studies who began treatment longer than 40 days from surgery were also excluded. The final data set included 296 cases from the NCOG studies (89%) and 1478 cases from the RTOG studies (85%). For patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) the median survival was 9.8 months in the RTOG studies and 13.0 months in the NCOG trial (p < 0.0001). For patients with AA the median survival was 35.1 months for the RTOG studies and 42.8 months in the NCOG trial (p = 0.126). Univariate results showed consistent results favoring BrdU among patients over 30 years of age, across the extent of surgery, and for GBM patients. A proportional hazards regression model that included treatment, histopathology, KPS, age, and extent of surgery demonstrated that treatment with BrdU was included in the best model only for the GBM group of patients (risk ratio 0.83).
Because of the heterogeneity of the treatment groups, including potentially important differences in pathology reviewers assessment of nonglioblastoma cases, differences in radiation dose and schedules, and chemotherapy during or after radiation, these analyses cannot provide the definitive answer as to whether BrdU given during radiation therapy improves survival in patients with malignant glioma. There does appear to be a favorable treatment effect seen in patients with GBM, with a lesser effect in patients with AA.
通过比较多个大型临床试验的历史生存数据,研究放疗期间使用溴脱氧尿苷(BrdU)治疗对恶性胶质瘤患者生存的影响。
对放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)的74 - 01、79 - 18和83 - 02试验以及北加利福尼亚肿瘤学组(NCOG)的6G - 82 - 1研究中的患者数据进行回顾性分析。两组提供患者数据,并由RTOG进行分析。收集治疗前特征,包括年龄、手术范围、卡诺夫斯基表现状态(KPS)和组织病理学;唯一评估的治疗变量是放疗期间BrdU的使用。分析中未控制放疗剂量、剂量分割方案、化疗的使用和/或化疗类型。进行单因素和多因素分析以检查BrdU对患者生存的潜在治疗效果。
收到了NCOG 6G - 82 - 1研究中334例接受BrdU治疗的患者以及3项RTOG研究中1743例未接受BrdU治疗的患者的数据。如果无法获得资格确认、患者不符合所进入研究的条件、未进行中心病理学审查或没有放疗数据,则将患者排除在审查之外。根据RTOG研究治疗的患者必须在手术后4周内开始放疗;NCOG研究没有此类限制。为确保研究之间的可比性,NCOG研究中手术开始治疗超过40天的患者也被排除。最终数据集包括NCOG研究中的296例(89%)和RTOG研究中的1478例(85%)。对于多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者,RTOG研究中的中位生存期为9.8个月,NCOG试验中为13.0个月(p < 0.0001)。对于间变性星形细胞瘤(AA)患者,RTOG研究中的中位生存期为35.1个月,NCOG试验中为42.8个月(p = 0.126)。单因素结果显示,在30岁以上的患者、不同手术范围以及GBM患者中,一致支持BrdU。一个包含治疗、组织病理学、KPS、年龄和手术范围的比例风险回归模型表明,仅对于GBM组患者,BrdU治疗被纳入最佳模型(风险比0.83)。
由于治疗组的异质性,包括病理检查者对非胶质母细胞瘤病例评估的潜在重要差异、放疗剂量和方案的差异以及放疗期间或之后的化疗差异,这些分析无法提供关于放疗期间给予BrdU是否能提高恶性胶质瘤患者生存率的明确答案。GBM患者似乎有明显的治疗效果,而AA患者的效果较小。