Kuhn W G, Carnes D L, Clement D J, Walker W A
Research Division, Department of Endodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 78284-7892, USA.
J Endod. 1997 Dec;23(12):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80345-7.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of modified and non-modified tip designs of both stainless steel and nickel-titanium endodontic hand files on root canal preparation. Root canals of mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were prepared using a quarter-turn-pull technique. The experimental design permitted comparison of the effects of nickel-titanium alloy construction or file tip modification alone, with effects when these two factors were incorporated into a single file design. Transportation, centering ratio, and dentin removal were evaluated using a modified Bramante technique. Nickel-titanium files, regardless of tip design, remained significantly more centered and demonstrated less apical transportation than stainless steel files at size 25. When instrumentation was continued to size 40 apically with step-back, there were no significant differences in transportation in the apical or coronal sections. However, during instrumentation to size 40 with step-back, the combination of modified tip and nickel-titanium alloy produced significantly more transportation and dentin removal, as well as greater deviation from the center at the mid-root level than did other file designs. Thus, of the file design parameters evaluated in this study, construction from nickel-titanium was most important in defining canal configuration at small file sizes in the apical region. Although the combination of nickel-titanium and modified tip design resulted in more transportation at larger file sizes in the midroot region, such alterations in canal configuration may be of little importance clinically. Nonetheless, it is suggested that other factors, such as tactile sensation and instrumentation technique, should be considered as important as the type of alloy or tip design.
本研究的目的是评估不锈钢和镍钛两种材质的根管预备手动锉刀的改良型和非改良型尖端设计对根管预备的影响。采用四分之一圈提拉技术对拔除的下颌磨牙近中根的根管进行预备。该实验设计允许比较镍钛合金材质或锉刀尖端改良单独产生的效果,以及这两个因素合并到单一锉刀设计中产生的效果。使用改良的布拉曼特技术评估根管偏移、定心率和牙本质去除情况。在25号锉刀时,无论尖端设计如何,镍钛锉刀的定心效果都显著更好,根尖偏移也比不锈钢锉刀更小。当以逐步后退法继续向根尖方向预备到40号时,根尖或冠部区域的根管偏移没有显著差异。然而,在以逐步后退法预备到40号的过程中,改良型尖端与镍钛合金相结合的锉刀设计比其他锉刀设计产生了显著更多的根管偏移和牙本质去除,并且在根中部水平偏离中心的程度更大。因此,在本研究评估的锉刀设计参数中,镍钛材质在确定根尖区域小尺寸锉刀时的根管形态方面最为重要。尽管镍钛合金与改良型尖端设计相结合在根中部区域较大尺寸锉刀时会导致更多的根管偏移,但这种根管形态的改变在临床上可能不太重要。尽管如此,建议应将其他因素,如触觉感受和预备技术,视为与合金类型或尖端设计同样重要。