Suppr超能文献

尼索地平包衣片与氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效及耐受性比较

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat core and hydrochlorothiazide in mild-to-moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Fodor J G

机构信息

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 1997 Jul-Aug;51(5):271-5.

PMID:9489083
Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat core (CC) 10-40 mg o.d. and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25-50 mg o.d. Patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension received either nisoldipine CC 10 mg o.d. or HCTZ 25 mg o.d. Treatment was titrated at two-weekly intervals as necessary. The primary efficacy endpoint was a defined reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Response rates were similar for both the nisoldipine CC- and HCTZ-treated groups (74% and 70%, respectively). Secondary efficacy endpoints were reductions in both diastolic and systolic blood pressures (SBP). At treatment endpoint, the change from baseline in SBP was 16.2 mmHg for the nisoldipine CC group and 14.9 mmHg for the HCTZ group. Both drugs were well tolerated, and adverse events were generally minor and typical of these antihypertensive agents. Drug-related adverse events were greater in the nisoldipine CC- than the HCTZ-treated patients (50% and 37%, respectively). Nisoldipine CC was shown to demonstrate antihypertensive efficacy similar to HCTZ in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

摘要

本研究比较了硝苯地平缓释片(CC)每日一次10 - 40毫克与氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)每日一次25 - 50毫克的疗效和耐受性。轻至中度原发性高血压患者分别接受硝苯地平CC每日一次10毫克或HCTZ每日一次25毫克治疗。必要时每两周调整一次治疗剂量。主要疗效终点是舒张压(DBP)的明确降低。硝苯地平CC治疗组和HCTZ治疗组的有效率相似(分别为74%和70%)。次要疗效终点是舒张压和收缩压(SBP)的降低。在治疗终点,硝苯地平CC组SBP较基线的变化为16.2毫米汞柱,HCTZ组为14.9毫米汞柱。两种药物耐受性均良好,不良事件一般较轻,且为这些抗高血压药物的典型不良反应。硝苯地平CC治疗患者的药物相关不良事件发生率高于HCTZ治疗患者(分别为50%和37%)。结果表明,在治疗轻至中度高血压方面,硝苯地平CC的降压疗效与HCTZ相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验